Pastor Dewayne Dunaway hair and beard in a business suit standing outdoors among green trees and bushes.

ARTICLES BY DEWAYNE

Christian Articles With A Purpose For Truth.

Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

LOVE: THE VERY BREATH OF HEAVEN

There is a command that falls from the lips of our Lord not as a burden, but as a revelation of heaven itself. When He says, “A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another as I have loved you” (John 13:34), He is not merely instructing conduct. He is unveiling the very life of God among men. This love is not born of earth, nor fashioned by human resolve, but descends from above, carrying with it the fragrance of Christ’s own heart. It is a love that stoops, a love that serves, a love that bleeds if necessary, and yet counts it joy to do so.

Consider how the Spirit describes this divine affection: “love suffers long and is kind; it envies not, it does not parade itself, it is not puffed up, it does not behave rudely, it seeks not its own, it is not easily provoked, it thinks no evil” (1 Corinthians 13:4-5). Here is no shallow sentiment, no passing warmth of emotion. This is a holy fire that endures wrong, overcomes pride, and triumphs over self. It is a love that walks quietly, yet powerfully, through the trials of life, bearing all things with a meekness that confounds the world.

And what is the fruit of such love? It is nothing less than the fulfilling of the law itself, for “love does no harm to a neighbor; therefore love is the fulfillment of the law” (Romans 13:10). Where love reigns, sin withers; where love abides, righteousness blossoms. The harsh word is silenced, the bitter thought is cast down, and the hand once clenched in selfishness is opened in mercy. Love is not merely one virtue among many, but the golden thread that binds them all together in perfect harmony (Colossians 3:14).

Yet we must not imagine that such love springs from our own nature, for the apostle declares plainly, “Beloved, let us love one another, for love is of God; and everyone who loves is born of God and knows God” (1 John 4:7). The fountain of this love is not within us, but in Him who first loved us. Indeed, we love Him because He first loved us (1 John 4:19), and thus every act of true love is but a reflection of that eternal affection which flowed from Calvary. If we would love aright, we must dwell near the cross, where love was not spoken merely, but poured out unto death.

See also how this love works itself out among the saints: “with all lowliness and gentleness, with longsuffering, bearing with one another in love” (Ephesians 4:2). It is patient with weakness, tender toward failure, and ready to forgive, for it knows its own need of mercy. It is no small thing to dwell in love with imperfect brethren, yet this is the very field where grace displays its power. “Above all things have fervent love for one another, for love will cover a multitude of sins” (1 Peter 4:8). Not by ignoring sin, but by overcoming it with mercy—by refusing to let offense have the final word.

And what shall we say of its growth? Love is not static, but living, for the prayer of the apostle is that the Lord would cause believers to increase and abound in love to one another and to all (1 Thessalonians 3:12). It widens its reach, extending beyond the circle of the familiar into the realm of the difficult and the undeserving. It is, indeed, the chief fruit of the Spirit, standing first among those graces that mark the life of God within the soul (Galatians 5:22).

Therefore, let us put on love as a garment, wear it as our daily covering, and let it be seen in word and deed alike. For in this, the world shall know whose we are, not by our knowledge, nor by our zeal alone, but by the unmistakable mark of Christ’s own love dwelling richly within us.

___________

O Lord, who has loved us with an everlasting love, shed abroad that same love within our hearts by Your Spirit. Teach us to love as Christ has loved us, to bear with one another in patience, and to walk in kindness and truth. Amen.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

THE SERMONS OF BRYAN DEWAYNE DUNAWAY (1): THE SAVIOR, THE SINNER, AND THE SUPREMACY OF GRACE

Luke 19:1-10

1 Then Jesus entered and passed through Jericho.

2 Now behold, there was a man named Zacchaeus who was a chief tax collector, and he was rich.

3 And he sought to see who Jesus was, but could not because of the crowd, for he was of short stature.

4 So he ran ahead and climbed up into a sycamore tree to see Him, for He was going to pass that way.

5 And when Jesus came to the place, He looked up and saw him, and said to him, “Zacchaeus, make haste and come down, for today I must stay at your house.”

6 So he made haste and came down, and received Him joyfully.

7 But when they saw it, they all complained, saying, “He has gone to be a guest with a man who is a sinner.”

8 Then Zacchaeus stood and said to the Lord, “Look, Lord, I give half of my goods to the poor; and if I have taken anything from anyone by false accusation, I restore fourfold.”

9 And Jesus said to him, “Today salvation has come to this house, because he also is a son of Abraham;

10 for the Son of Man has come to seek and to save that which was lost.”

Friend, here is one of the sweetest scenes in all the Word of God. A seeking Savior meets a searching sinner, and salvation steps into a home that nobody else would have entered.

I want to give you three truths—simple, strong, and saturated with grace—and I want you to remember them.

THE SEEKING SAVIOR

THE SEARCHING SINNER

THE SUPERNATURAL SALVATION

1. THE SEEKING SAVIOR

Verse 10 tells us plainly:

“For the Son of Man has come to seek and to save that which was lost.”

Jesus was not wandering…He was working. He was not guessing…He was guided. He was not reacting…He was redeeming.

Zacchaeus thought he was looking for Jesus, but the truth is, Jesus was looking for Zacchaeus long before Zacchaeus ever climbed that tree.

Notice verse 5:

“And when Jesus came to the place, He looked up and saw him, and said… ‘Zacchaeus…’”

He called him by name.

That will bless your heart if you let it. The Lord of glory walking through Jericho, crowds pressing in, voices everywhere—and He stops…looks up…and singles out one sinner.

That’s grace.

I heard about a little boy lost in a department store. He was crying, frightened, and confused. The security guard didn’t say, “Son, find your parents.” No, he got on the intercom and said, “Will the parents of this child come and get him?”

Friend, salvation is not you finding God, it is God finding you.

2. THE SEARCHING SINNER

Now don’t miss Zacchaeus here. The Bible says in verse 3:

“And he sought to see who Jesus was…”

There was something stirring in this man. He had money, but no meaning. He had position, but no peace.

Verse 2 says he was “a chief tax collector, and he was rich.”

That means he had climbed the ladder, but it was leaning against the wrong wall.

So what does he do?

Verse 4:

“So he ran ahead and climbed up into a sycamore tree…”

Now don’t rush past that. Grown men didn’t run in that culture. Wealthy men didn’t climb trees. Respectable men didn’t act like children.

But Zacchaeus didn’t care anymore. When a man is drowning, he is not concerned about dignity, he is concerned about deliverance.

That’s Zacchaeus. Something inside him said, “I must see Jesus.”

But here’s the truth:

His seeking was real, but it was not sufficient. He could climb a tree, but he could not climb into salvation. He could look at Jesus, but he could not save himself.

Friend, religion can make you search, but only Christ can save.

3. THE SUPERNATURAL SALVATION

Now watch what happens.

Verse 5:

“Zacchaeus, make haste and come down, for today I must stay at your house.”

Verse 6:

“So he made haste and came down, and received Him joyfully.”

That’s salvation right there.

Jesus calls, Zacchaeus comes. Jesus invites, Zacchaeus receives.

And then everything changes.

Verse 8:

“Look, Lord, I give half of my goods to the poor…and if I have taken anything…I restore fourfold.”

Now listen carefully—this is not how he got saved; this is how we know he got saved.

Salvation is not behavior modification, it is heart transformation.

Then Jesus declares in verse 9:

“Today salvation has come to this house…”

Not tomorrow. Not someday. Not after probation.

Today.

If you walked into a dark room and flipped on the light, you wouldn’t say, “Well, the darkness is gradually leaving.” No, instantly—completely—light fills the room.

That’s what happened in Zacchaeus’ life.

From greed to generosity.

From guilt to grace.

From lost to saved.

That is supernatural salvation.

THE SEEKING SAVIOR

THE SEARCHING SINNER

THE SUPERNATURAL SALVATION

CONCLUSION

Friend, where are you in this story?

Are you like Zacchaeus, searching, restless, climbing, trying?

Or have you heard the voice of the Savior calling your name?

Because the same Jesus who stopped under that tree is still stopping for sinners today.

And He is still saying:

“Come down, I must stay with you.”

The question is not will He receive you?

The question is will you receive Him?

____________

Lord Jesus, we thank You that You are still seeking the lost. We confess that we have climbed many trees of our own making, searching for meaning apart from You. Draw us down by Your grace. Call us by name. Enter our hearts and transform our lives. Let salvation come, not someday, but today. In Your holy name, Amen.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

THE HOLY BURDEN OF PRAYER

Prayer is not a polite religious gesture, nor a quiet formality tucked into the corners of a busy life. It is the soul’s encounter with the living God. It is the place where man, stripped of pretense, stands before the Eternal and feels both his nothingness and his need. “Men always ought to pray and not lose heart” (Luke 18:1), yet how seldom men truly pray. Words are spoken, forms are followed, but the heart often remains distant, unmoved, untouched by the weight of divine reality.

We have made prayer too small. We have reduced it to asking, to requesting, to presenting our list before God as though He were a servant waiting upon our desires. But true prayer begins not with our needs, but with God’s nature. When a man sees God as He is, high and lifted up, holy beyond comprehension, then prayer becomes something altogether different. It is no longer an attempt to persuade God, but a surrender before Him. “Your will be done” (Matthew 6:10) ceases to be a phrase and becomes the cry of a yielded heart.

There is a mystery here that cannot be ignored. The God who needs nothing invites us to ask. The One who knows all things bids us to speak. Yet He is not moved by the noise of our petitions, but by the posture of our souls. “The effective, fervent prayer of a righteous man avails much” (James 5:16), not because of its volume or repetition, but because it rises from a life aligned with God. Prayer that costs nothing accomplishes nothing. It is the prayer born in humility, shaped by obedience, and carried by faith that reaches the throne.

Too often we separate prayer from life. We imagine that we can live as we please and then approach God as though nothing has transpired between. But God is not mocked. “One who turns away his ear from hearing the law, even his prayer is an abomination” (Proverbs 28:9). The man who would pray must first listen. The lips that speak to God must belong to a life that seeks Him. Otherwise, prayer becomes an empty sound, echoing only in the chambers of the self.

And yet, prayer is not inactivity. It is not an escape from responsibility, nor a refuge for spiritual laziness. The man who truly prays will be moved to act. He cannot kneel before God and remain indifferent to the will of God. To pray for the kingdom is to commit oneself to the King. To ask for bread is to accept the call to labor. Prayer that does not lead to obedience is not prayer as the Scriptures reveal it.

Faith stands at the center of it all. Not a shallow confidence that God will grant every desire, but a deep, settled trust in who He is. “Without faith it is impossible to please Him” (Hebrews 11:6). Faith bows before mystery and rests in the character of God. It does not demand explanations; it yields to wisdom. Even when heaven seems silent, faith believes that God is neither absent nor indifferent.

In the end, prayer is not about getting things from God. It is about getting God Himself. It is the lifting of the heart into the light of His presence, the quieting of the soul before His majesty, the yielding of the will to His purpose. And in that sacred place, something happens that cannot be measured or explained. Man is changed. Not always outwardly, not always immediately, but deeply and eternally. For the one who truly prays does not leave as he came; he carries with him the imprint of the Eternal.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

THE HARDEST QUESTIONS IN THE ABORTION DEBATE THAT REFUSE TO GO AWAY

If one is honest—truly honest—this issue is not as simple as slogans, nor as clean as political lines drawn in the sand. It is a tangle of biology, philosophy, theology, and power; and many who speak with certainty have not followed their own convictions to their logical end. If we are to speak truthfully, then we must not ask easy questions that confirm what we already believe, but hard questions that unsettle us.

Let us begin at the place most arguments begin: “life begins at conception.” That phrase sounds clear, until you examine what nature itself does with “conception.” Scientists estimate that a significant majority of fertilized eggs never implant in the uterus—some estimates range as high as 60-80 percent. If every fertilized egg is a full human life in the same sense as a born child, then we must ask: what do we make of this vast, silent loss? Is nature itself the greatest destroyer of what we call “persons”? And if so, why is there no moral urgency in churches about this continual, natural destruction of “life”?

Then comes the question of implantation, which exposes a deep inconsistency. Medically, pregnancy is typically defined as beginning at implantation, not fertilization. Yet many evangelical arguments insist that moral personhood begins earlier, at fertilization. If that is true, then anything that prevents implantation becomes morally equivalent to abortion. But this leads directly into uncomfortable territory.

Consider the IUD. It is widely understood to work primarily by preventing fertilization—by impairing sperm movement and access to the egg. Yet there is also evidence—though debated—that it may sometimes prevent implantation of an already fertilized embryo. Now the question presses: if preventing implantation is morally the same as abortion, then are millions of Christian women using IUDs unknowingly participating in what they would otherwise condemn? Why is there so little outrage about this compared to surgical abortion?

Now let’s push further. If fertilization creates a full human person, then what exactly is the moral difference between:

  • preventing sperm from reaching the egg

  • preventing a fertilized egg from implanting

  • terminating a pregnancy after implantation

Biologically, these are points along a continuous process, not clean moral categories. Yet many moral systems treat them as radically different without clearly explaining why.

And then comes perhaps the most destabilizing question of all:

Why does moral status begin at the moment sperm meets egg and not before?

Sperm cells are alive. Egg cells are alive. Each carries human DNA. Each is part of the same continuous chain of life. Fertilization does not create life from non-life—it reorganizes existing life into a new genetic combination. So why is that precise moment treated as morally decisive? What actually changes in that instant that justifies assigning full moral personhood?

If the answer is “potential,” then we must ask: sperm and egg together also have potential. If the answer is “unique DNA,” then tumors can have unique DNA. If the answer is “God ordains it,” then where, precisely, is that defined. And how consistently is it applied?

Now step into the world of IVF, where the tension becomes unavoidable. In a single IVF cycle, multiple embryos are often created, and only a small percentage result in live birth. The rest may be frozen indefinitely or discarded. Many evangelicals who insist that life begins at conception must then face this: are fertility clinics committing mass destruction of human lives? And if so, why is there not the same level of protest, urgency, or legislation directed at IVF as there is toward abortion?

Even within evangelical circles, this inconsistency is being acknowledged. As IVF becomes more common, believers who hold to “life at conception” are being forced to reconsider the implications of their own theology. Because once you affirm personhood at conception, you cannot easily avoid the moral weight of what happens in laboratories, freezers, and failed implantations.

And then, beyond biology, lies the question of government power.

If the state declares that life begins at conception, then logically it must:

  • regulate contraception that might prevent implantation

  • monitor fertility treatments

  • potentially investigate miscarriages

  • define legal personhood at the embryonic stage

This is not theoretical. Extending personhood to embryos has already raised concerns about how far legal control would reach into reproduction and medicine. The question is unavoidable: Are those who oppose abortion prepared for the full weight of government intrusion that their position requires?

And what of the church? If the church claims moral authority here, it must answer why its teaching often stops short of its own logic. Why condemn one form of ending potential life while remaining largely silent on others that operate on the same biological continuum?

In the end, the hardest questions are not merely scientific or political. They are questions of consistency.

  • If life begins at conception, why is natural embryo loss not treated as a moral crisis?

  • If preventing implantation is wrong, why are many contraceptives widely accepted?

  • If embryos are full persons, why is IVF not universally condemned with the same intensity as abortion?

  • If the government must protect life at conception, how far should its power extend into private bodies and medical decisions?

  • And if the church speaks for God on this matter, why does it struggle to apply its own principles evenly?

These are not easy questions. They are not comfortable questions. But they are necessary questions for anyone who seeks truth rather than certainty, and integrity rather than slogans.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

THE QUIET TYRANNY OF SELF AND THE GLORIOUS LIBERTY OF CHRIST

There is within every person a throne that will not remain empty. Either self shall sit upon it, ruling with a restless and exacting hand, or Christ shall reign there in meekness and majesty. Self is a cruel monarch. It promises freedom, yet binds the soul with invisible chains; it speaks of fulfillment, yet leaves the heart hollow and unsatisfied.

The Word of God declares that he who trusts in his own heart is a fool, but blessed is the man who walks in the wisdom that comes from above (Proverbs 28:26; James 3:17). And yet, how often do we cling to the very tyrant that destroys us, fearing to surrender to the gentle Lord who alone can save.

The dominion of self is subtle. It does not always appear in gross sin or outward rebellion, but often cloaks itself in respectable garments. It may speak in the language of religion, perform acts of duty, and yet remain utterly estranged from the life of God. A man may bow his head in prayer while still enthroning his own will above the will of heaven.

The Lord Jesus spoke plainly when He said that whoever desires to come after Him must deny himself, take up his cross daily, and follow Him (Luke 9:23). This denial is not the mere restraint of outward actions, but the surrender of the inward throne, the yielding up of all rights to rule one’s own life.

Yet the soul trembles at such a call. It imagines that to yield to Christ is to lose all joy, all freedom, all delight. But this is the grand deception of sin. For in losing ourselves, we find ourselves; in dying, we live; in surrendering all, we gain all.

The Savior Himself declared that whoever loses his life for His sake shall find it (Matthew 16:25). There is a liberty in Christ that the world cannot comprehend, a peace that flows like a river through the heart that has ceased from its own striving and rests wholly in Him (Isaiah 26:3; 48:18; Philippians 4:7).

Consider the beauty of His reign. Christ does not govern as self does. He does not burden the soul with impossible demands while withholding strength. No, He gives what He commands. When He calls us to holiness, He supplies His own Spirit; when He bids us walk in righteousness, He becomes our righteousness; when He commands us to love, He pours His love into our hearts (Romans 5:5). His yoke is easy, and His burden is light, not because it requires nothing, but because He carries it with us, and indeed within us (Matthew 11:28-30; Galatians 2:20).

How then shall we be free from the tyranny of self? Not by striving in our own strength, for that is but self attempting to dethrone itself, which it will never do. The answer is found in the cross of Christ. There, self is not reformed but crucified.

The apostle declares that our old man was crucified with Him, that the body of sin might be done away with, that we should no longer be slaves of sin (Romans 6:6; Galatians 2:20; 5:24). We must come again and again to that cross, not merely as a place of pardon, but as the place of death and new life.

And when Christ takes His rightful place upon the throne, the soul is transformed. The restless striving ceases. The anxious grasping gives way to quiet trust. The heart, once divided and conflicted, becomes single in its devotion.

Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty (2 Corinthians 3:17). This liberty is not the freedom to do as we please, but the glorious freedom to do as we ought, to delight in the will of God, to walk in His ways with joy and gladness (Psalm 40:8).

Let us then cast down every idol of self and bow before the rightful King. Let us not cling to that which destroys us, but yield to Him who gave Himself for us. For His reign is life, His rule is peace, and His presence is fullness of joy (Psalm 16:11; John 10:10).

___________

Lord Jesus, take the throne of my heart and reign without rival. Deliver me from the tyranny of self, and teach me to delight in Your will. Crucify all that is not of You within me, and raise me up in the power of Your life. Let Your Spirit fill me, Your love constrain me, and Your presence be my joy, now and forever. Amen.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

IF YOU’RE AS AGAINST ABORTION AS YOU CLAIM

If abortion is truly the defining moral issue—if it is, as many say, the great evil of our age—then consistency is not optional. A belief that centers on the value of human life cannot be selectively applied without losing all credibility. And yet, when examined closely, the modern pro-life religious movement often reveals not a unified ethic of life, but a fragmented one—fierce in one moment, strangely quiet in another.

First, if abortion is the ultimate moral line, then it would override party loyalty. Yet research shows abortion views are deeply tied to political identity, not transcendent moral conviction. Voting behavior has become strongly aligned with party affiliation, meaning many voters remain loyal to political tribes even when candidates soften or contradict pro-life positions. Recent political shifts show major figures backing away from strict anti-abortion stances for strategic reasons, while still receiving strong support from pro-life voters. If abortion were truly non-negotiable, compromise would be unthinkable—but it happens regularly.

Second, if the movement were wholly about preserving life, it would extend beyond birth. Critics—both secular and religious—have long pointed out that many who identify as pro-life show far less urgency toward issues like poverty, healthcare, maternal mortality, or child welfare. This critique is not merely rhetorical; it reflects measurable realities in regions that strongly oppose abortion yet struggle with high infant mortality, poor healthcare access, and social instability  . If life is sacred, then its care must continue after delivery—not end at it.

Third, if the concern is truly about saving lives, then the most effective methods would be embraced. But here again, inconsistency appears. Policies shown to reduce abortion—such as expanded healthcare access, contraception, and economic support for mothers—often receive resistance within the same circles that oppose abortion most strongly. The result is a tension between stated goals (reducing abortion) and supported policies (which do not always achieve that outcome). Even critics within philosophical discussions note that inconsistency arguments arise precisely because actions do not always align with stated beliefs about the value of life.

Fourth, if every embryo is fully equal in moral value, then issues like miscarriage and IVF would provoke the same urgency as abortion. Yet spontaneous pregnancy loss—far more common than induced abortion—rarely receives comparable mobilization, despite involving massive loss of embryonic life  . Likewise, debates over IVF expose deep fractures within the movement, as some oppose it entirely while others support it for political or cultural reasons. A consistent ethic would not selectively prioritize one form of fetal loss over another.

Fifth, if the issue is purely moral rather than political or cultural, then it would not fluctuate based on messaging strategies. Yet studies show that support for abortion restrictions can shift depending on how arguments are framed—whether in terms of fetal rights or women’s wellbeing—indicating that persuasion often hinges on rhetoric rather than fixed moral absolutes. This suggests the movement operates, at least in part, within the dynamics of political influence rather than purely moral clarity.

Sixth, if the belief is that abortion is equivalent to taking a human life, then the response would logically mirror how society treats other forms of killing. Yet even within the movement, there is deep division on whether women should be criminally prosecuted, with mainstream groups often rejecting that approach while fringe factions demand it. This inconsistency raises a difficult question: if it is truly viewed as murder, why is it not treated uniformly as such?

Seventh, if this is about life rather than control, then bodily autonomy would be addressed consistently across all scenarios. Yet abortion debates uniquely compel one person to use their body for another’s survival, a standard not applied elsewhere in law or ethics. This tension sits at the heart of ongoing philosophical criticism and reveals unresolved contradictions in how “life” is defined and protected.

Taken together, these tensions do not prove that every individual who opposes abortion is insincere. Many are deeply convicted, compassionate, and morally serious. But they do reveal that the movement as a whole is not as unified or as consistent as it often presents itself. It is shaped by politics, culture, strategy, and selective emphasis as much as by moral conviction.

And that is the central challenge: if one claims to stand for life, then life must be defended everywhere it is fragile—before birth, after birth, in poverty, in sickness, in systems of injustice, in policies that either sustain or crush the vulnerable. Anything less invites the charge that what is called “pro-life” is, in practice, something narrower.

A belief that claims the highest moral ground must also bear the weight of the highest consistency. Otherwise, it becomes not a flagrant contradiction rather than a testimony.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

THE SECRET PLACE OF UNION WITH CHRIST

The deeper life of real and abiding faith in Jesus is hidden from the eyes of men, yet open and radiant before God. It is the inward abiding of the soul in Christ, where the heart learns to rest not in its own strength, but in the sufficiency of Another. Many speak of following Him, yet few understand what it is to dwell in Him. For the call of the Lord is not merely to walk after Him at a distance, but to live in Him as the branch lives in the vine, drawing all its life from His fullness (John 15:4-5; Galatians 2:20; Colossians 3:3).

This union is not attained by striving, nor is it preserved by human effort. The soul that would know it must first come to the end of itself. It must lay down every confidence in the flesh, every reliance upon its own wisdom, and yield wholly to the working of the Spirit. For it is written that we are complete in Him, and that in Him dwells all the fullness of God, given to us by grace (Colossians 2:9-10). We have no confidence in the flesh (Philippians 3:3). The more deeply we see our own insufficiency, the more freely His sufficiency becomes our portion.

Yet this abiding is not passive in the sense of indifference. It is a living surrender, a continual turning of the heart toward Christ. The soul must learn to look unto Jesus in all things, not only in moments of need, but in every breath of its existence. As the Bible declares that we are to pray without ceasing and to set our minds on things above, so the life of union becomes a steady, quiet fellowship with Him who dwells within (1 Thessalonians 5:17; Colossians 3:1-2). In this fellowship, the heart is kept in peace, and the will is gently conformed to His will.

There is a sweetness in this hidden life that the world cannot give, nor take away. It is the peace of Christ ruling in the heart, the assurance that we are kept by His power and not our own. Trials may come, and the outward man may be pressed on every side, yet the inward man is renewed day by day, strengthened by the presence of the Lord (2 Corinthians 4:16-17). The soul that abides in Him finds that even suffering becomes a means of deeper communion.

Beloved, the Lord does not call you to a distant admiration of His life, but to a present participation in it. He invites you into the secret place, where His Spirit teaches you to live from Him, through Him, and unto Him. As you yield yourself fully to Him, you will find that He Himself becomes your life, your strength, and your joy. And in that sacred union, the fruit of His life will be manifested in you, not by effort, but by the quiet working of His grace.

___________

O Lord Jesus, draw me into that secret place where I may abide in You and You in me. Keep me near to Your heart, that I may know the sweetness of Your presence and bear fruit unto Your glory. Amen.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

KEISHA THOMAS: A LOVE THAT STOOD IN THE MIDST OF VIOLENCE

At times in this fallen world, darkness surges forward with a kind of restless force, stirring the hearts of men into heat and agitation, until restraint gives way and wrath seems to seize the moment, pressing in on every side. Yet even there, the grace of God may break forth as a sudden light, confounding the works of the flesh and bearing witness to a higher law written upon the heart. Such a moment was seen in the life of Keisha Thomas, when, in the midst of rage, she chose mercy; when, surrounded by blows, she became a shield.

For what is the religion of Jesus Christ if it does not conquer the very spirit of vengeance? The Word declares that though we were once hateful and hating one another, yet the kindness and love of God our Savior appeared (Titus 3:3-4).

This love is not a notion only, nor a fair profession upon the lips, but a living principle, constraining the soul to act contrary to nature. When others cried out for justice mingled with fury, she answered with a compassion that seemed altogether unreasonable to the natural man. Yet herein is the perfection of love, that it seeks not its own, is not provoked, and thinks no evil (1 Corinthians 13:5).

Consider the scene: a man, despised for his association with hatred and the KKK, fallen beneath the blows of many, his life in peril. Who would interpose? Who would hazard themselves for one so unworthy? But the Gospel does not inquire first into the worthiness of its object. It beholds a soul, and that is enough.

Did not our Lord die for the ungodly (Romans 5:6)? Did He not pray for those who crucified Him (Luke 23:34)? Thus, in that hour, without sermon or proclamation, this young woman bore a testimony more powerful than many words, fulfilling in deed what is written: do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good (Romans 12:21).

This is the very temper which marks the children of God. It is easy to love those who love us, and to defend those who stand on our side; even sinners do the same (Matthew 5:46). But to love where there is enmity, to protect where there is hatred, this is the work of divine grace. Here is the evidence of a heart renewed, a will surrendered, and affections purified. For perfect love casts out fear (1 John 4:18), and where fear is gone, boldness rises—not the boldness of pride, but of holy love.

Let none suppose that such love weakens the cause of righteousness. On the contrary, it establishes it. For wrath does not work the righteousness of God (James 1:20), nor can violence bring forth peace. The kingdom of Christ is not advanced by the sword of man, but by the Spirit of God, who subdues hearts and transforms enemies into neighbors. In that moment of self-forgetting mercy, there was a victory more profound than any triumph of force.

O that this mind were in us all! That we might not only profess Christ, but walk as He walked (1 John 2:6); that in the hour of provocation we might remember His cross, and in the face of hatred we might reveal His love. For the world is not changed by louder arguments, but by holier lives. And when such love is seen, it cannot be easily gainsaid, for it bears the unmistakable mark of heaven itself.

___________

O Lord of all grace, who loved us when we were yet sinners, write this law of love upon our hearts. Teach us to overcome evil with good, to bless those who curse, and to show mercy without partiality. Amen.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

THE INWARD GOVERNMENT OF CHRIST

That which is outwardly Christian and that which is inwardly governed by Christ are not the same. Much may bear His name, speak His language, and yet remain untouched in its deepest springs by His life. The Lord does not first seek to improve the exterior, but to establish His throne within the heart. For it is written that the kingdom of God is not coming with observation, but is within you (Luke 17:20-21). Until Christ has His place in the hidden man of the heart, all else remains uncertain, unstable, and ultimately unsatisfying.

The tragedy of so much spiritual experience lies here, that men take up things about Christ without yielding themselves wholly to Christ. They embrace teachings, adopt practices, and contend for truths, yet the Lord Himself does not possess the ground.

The apostle speaks of Christ dwelling in our hearts through faith (Ephesians 3:17), and again of Christ being formed in us (Galatians 4:19). These are not figures of speech only, but point to a real inward work, a deep and patient operation of the Spirit, bringing every part of our being under His rule. It is one thing to know doctrines, but quite another to be inwardly mastered by the Lord.

God’s method is always inward before it is outward. He begins in secret places, dealing with motives, desires, and intentions. The Word of God is living and active, discerning the thoughts and intents of the heart (Hebrews 4:12). We may be occupied with what we do for God, while He is concerned with what we are before Him. The pressure of His hand is often felt in ways that strip us of our own strength and wisdom, leading us to a place where only Christ can be our sufficiency (2 Corinthians 3:5). This is not easy for the natural man, but it is essential if the Lord is to have that which satisfies His heart.

There comes a point where the Lord will not allow us to go on with a divided life. He presses for fullness. He requires that every chamber be opened to Him. If He is resisted, there will be a sense of limitation, a lack of rest, a consciousness that something is not complete. But when He gains His place, there is a new sense of life, a quiet authority, and a deep inward peace that cannot be explained by outward circumstances (Colossians 3:15). This is the fruit of His government, not imposed from without, but established within.

The Cross stands at the center of this work. It is by the Cross that the self-life is brought to an end and room is made for Christ. Those who belong to Christ have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires (Galatians 5:24). This is not merely a truth to be believed, but a reality to be experienced as the Spirit applies the death of Christ to all that is not of Him. And yet the Cross is never an end in itself. It always leads to resurrection, to the release of His life within us (Philippians 3:10-11). Where the Cross does its work deeply, Christ becomes all.

What the Lord is after, then, is a people in whom He Himself is expressed. Not in word only, nor in activity alone, but in nature and character. He must increase, but I must decrease (John 3:30) becomes the law of such a life. And as He gains ground within, there is a testimony that goes beyond what can be spoken, something that carries the fragrance of Christ into every situation (2 Corinthians 2:14-15). This is the true ministry, the outflow of an inward union with Him.

So the question comes to us, not how much we know, nor how much we do, but how much room the Lord has. Has He reached the deepest places. Has He dealt with that which resists Him. Has He established His throne within. These are the matters that determine everything in the sight of God. For in the end, it is not what we have held, but what has held us, that will stand.

____________

Lord Jesus, bring me under Your inward rule. Search the hidden places of my heart and remove all that resists You. Lead me by Your Cross into the fullness of Your resurrection life, and make me wholly Yours. Amen.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

ABOUT THESE GOVERNING AUTHORITIES

People with an agenda other than Christ are careless in the way they handle the Word of God. A single passage is lifted out of its setting and made to carry a meaning it was never meant to bear. That is precisely what happens when Romans 13 is dragged into modern political arguments and used as a blanket command to support a particular leader. The apostle is not campaigning for a man, nor baptizing any ruler with divine approval. He is teaching something far deeper, far more demanding, about God’s sovereignty and the believer’s conduct in a fallen world.

When Paul writes that the governing authorities are appointed by God (Romans 13:1-2), he is not declaring that every action of every ruler is righteous, nor that believers must give uncritical allegiance to whoever holds power. The same Bible testifies that rulers can be unjust, corrupt, and even opposed to God’s purposes. Pharaoh hardened his heart and oppressed God’s people (Exodus 5:2; 9:12). Nebuchadnezzar exalted himself in pride until God brought him low (Daniel 4:30-31). Authority may be permitted by God, but it is never beyond His judgment.

The meaning of Romans 13 must be read alongside the whole counsel of God. The apostles themselves, when commanded by authorities to stop preaching Christ, answered plainly that they must obey God rather than men (Acts 5:29). That single declaration shatters the idea that submission to government is absolute. It is real, but it is not ultimate. God alone holds that place. When human authority steps outside its proper bounds and demands what God forbids or forbids what God commands, the believer’s path is clear.

Even within Romans 13, the purpose of authority is defined. Rulers are described as servants of God for good, a restraint against evil, a means of maintaining order (Romans 13:3-4). Unjust wars and mocking Christ do not come into play. The passage is descriptive of what government is meant to be, not a guarantee that it always fulfills that calling. When authority punishes good and rewards evil, it stands in contradiction to the very standard Paul outlines. To then claim such authority must be supported without question is but a distortion of the Word of God.

The early Christians understood this well. They lived under the rule of emperors who were often hostile to the faith, yet they did not organize political movements to enthrone or defend those rulers. They didn’t wave Nero flags or wear Make Rome Great Again hats. They paid taxes, they lived peaceably where possible, and they prayed for those in authority (1 Timothy 2:1-2), but their allegiance remained firmly anchored in Christ. They did not confuse the kingdom of God with the kingdoms of this world (John 18:36). Their hope was not in Caesar, and it must not be in any modern figure either.

To use Romans 13 as a weapon to demand loyalty to a political leader is to misuse the Word of God. It reduces a profound teaching about order and conscience into a slogan for power. It asks believers to equate submission with endorsement, and respect with devotion. But God never commands us to place our trust in princes, nor to give our hearts to earthly rulers (Psalm 146:3). The line between a limited honoring of authority and idolizing it must not be blurred.

This is not a call to rebellion or lawlessness. The same passage calls believers to be subject, to avoid needless conflict, to live as those who recognize God’s hand even in imperfect systems (Romans 13:5-7). But submission is not the same as celebration, and obedience is not the same as allegiance of the heart. A Christian may comply with laws, pay taxes, and live peaceably, while still discerning rightly the character and actions of those in power.

The deeper danger is spiritual. When believers begin to wrap the cause of Christ around a political figure, they risk tying the reputation of the gospel to the conduct of a man or a movement. And men and movements fail. Always. The gospel does not need a political savior, because it already has a risen King. Christ reigns, not by election or approval ratings, but by the authority given to Him from the Father (Matthew 28:18).

So let Romans 13 stand as it is written. It calls us to humility, to order, to a recognition that God is not absent from the structures of this world. But it does not call us to blind loyalty, nor does it sanctify any leader as beyond critique.

The church must be wiser than that. Our citizenship is in heaven (Philippians 3:20). Our King is not on a ballot. And our hope does not rise or fall with any administration. Let us give to governing authorities what is theirs, but never give them what belongs to God alone (Matthew 22:21).

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

THE LORD’S SUPPER AND THE LIBERTY OF LOVE

There is a table set before the people of God, simple and sacred, not adorned with the inventions of men but filled with the meaning of Christ Himself. The Lord’s Supper was given on the night He was betrayed, in the quiet solemnity of a shared meal, where bread was broken and a cup was blessed. He said in effect that this was to be done in remembrance of Him (1 Corinthians 11:23-25; Luke 22:19). Yet even in something so holy, men have often multiplied questions where God has given simplicity, pressing beyond what is written and binding where the Lord has left freedom.

We ask what day it must be observed, and how often, as though the power lies in the calendar rather than in Christ. But God’s word does not bind us to a rigid schedule. We read that the early disciples gathered and broke bread, and we see a pattern of devotion, but not a law carved in stone (Acts 2:42; Acts 20:7). The apostle speaks of coming together and partaking, yet he does not command a fixed frequency. Instead, he says that as often as you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death till He comes (1 Corinthians 11:26). The emphasis is not on how often, but on what is remembered. The Supper is not sanctified by repetition, but by reverence.

Nor are we given a detailed manual for every aspect of its observance. We know the Lord took bread and the fruit of the vine, but even here we understand by inference, recognizing the setting in which He instituted it during the Passover meal (Matthew 26:26-29). The Bible does not pause to specify every element with technical precision, nor do they bind us with exhaustive instruction about the exact manner in which it must be done. What we have is enough to guide the heart, but not so much as to enslave the conscience. God, who knows how to speak plainly, has not left salvation hanging on the fine threads of human deduction.

If these details were matters of importance, the Word of God would speak with unmistakable clarity, leaving no room for division. Yet history shows that men, even when striving to be faithful, cannot agree among themselves on these points. This itself is a testimony that such matters were not intended to bear the weight we place upon them. The kingdom of God is not in food and drink, but in righteousness, peace, and joy in the Holy Spirit (Romans 14:17). Where God has given liberty, we must not create law.

This does not make the Supper common, nor does it empty it of meaning. On the contrary, it calls us back to its true significance. It is a remembrance of Christ crucified, a proclamation of His death, a participation in His body and blood in a spiritual sense, and a communion of believers gathered in unity (1 Corinthians 10:16-17). The danger is not that we will observe it imperfectly in form, but that we will miss its heart entirely, partaking without discernment, without love, without regard for one another (1 Corinthians 11:27-29).

The Lord’s concern, as always, is deeper than outward arrangement. He looks for a people who come to His table with humility, examining themselves, forgiving one another, and lifting their eyes to the cross (1 Corinthians 11:28; Matthew 5:23-24). Whether the Supper is observed often or less frequently, whether in a simple gathering or a more structured assembly, the question remains the same: is Christ being honored, and are His people being edified?

When we understand this, we are freed from striving over shadows and drawn into the substance. We hold our opinions with conviction, yet without condemnation toward others who differ in matters where God has not bound the conscience (Romans 14:5-6). Unity is not found in uniformity of detail, but in shared devotion to the Savior. The table becomes not a place of division, but a place of fellowship, where hearts meet in the remembrance of redeeming love.

And so the Supper remains what it was always meant to be: a simple, profound act of worship, centered not on precision of form, but on the Person of Christ. Bread broken, a cup shared, and a people gathered in faith, proclaiming that Jesus died, that He lives, and that He will come again (1 Corinthians 11:26).

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

WHAT MATTERS TO GOD (AND WHAT DOES NOT)

There is a great difference between what fills the conversations of men and what fills the heart of God. We often strain at details, drawing lines where God has left liberty, while neglecting the weightier matters that the Lord Himself has plainly revealed.

Jesus once rebuked religious leaders for this very thing, telling them they tithed the smallest herbs while overlooking justice, mercy, and faithfulness (Matthew 23:23). The ministry of Christ continually pulls us away from needless divisions and presses us toward the things that truly matter in the sight of God.

Consider first the matters that do not carry the weight we often give them. Assemblies, for example, can be good, but the exact form they take is not bound in rigid detail. Whether believers gather on one day or another, in homes or larger gatherings, with structured order or simple fellowship, the purpose remains the same: to honor Christ and edify His people (Hebrews 10:24-25; 1 Corinthians 14:26). The early church met frequently and in various ways, and the Bible gives us principles, not a narrow blueprint. God looks not at the arrangement of the meeting but at the hearts of those who gather in His name.

The same can be said of the Lord’s Supper. It is a holy remembrance, a shared participation in the body and blood of Christ, calling us to proclaim His death until He comes (1 Corinthians 11:23-26). Yet the Scriptures do not bind us to a precise frequency or prescribe the exact elements. It is not the complexity of the meal that sanctifies it, but the Christ it proclaims. When taken in faith, humility, and unity, it fulfills its purpose. When turned into a point of contention, it loses the spirit in which it was given.

Music, too, has become a dividing line where God has given room. Whether voices rise alone or instruments accompany them, whether songs are ancient hymns or newly written praises, the call remains to sing to the Lord with grace in the heart (Ephesians 5:19; Colossians 3:16). God is not confined to a style or tradition. He receives worship from hearts that delight in Him—for the only “worship service” He will accept is a life lived for Him (Romans 12:1-2; John 4:23-24). The melody He seeks is not in the sound but in the soul.

Even in baptism, where meaning runs deep, debates over the precise mode can overshadow the greater reality. Baptism points to union with Christ in His death and resurrection, a visible expression of one’s inward faith (Romans 6:3-4; Galatians 3:27). While immersion beautifully portrays this truth, so do aspersion or affusion if the believer is committed to trusting Jesus and following Him as best they understand Him. The power is not in the amount of water but in the grace of God and the faith of the believer. God, who knows how to speak with clarity, has not left us dependent on endless human deciphering for salvation. He sees the heart, and He honors faith that looks to Christ.

But if these are not the things that weigh heavily in the balance, then what does? The Bible answers with unmistakable clarity. God cares deeply about justice, about how we treat one another, about whether we reflect His heart in a broken world. He has made from one blood every nation of men, tearing down the walls that divide, calling us to see one another not through the lens of race or status but through the image of God (Acts 17:26; Galatians 3:28). To show partiality is to deny the very gospel we profess (James 2:1-4).

He cares for the poor, the overlooked, the ones the world passes by. Again and again, the Word of God calls us to remember them, to open our hands, to bear one another’s burdens. True religion is not found in outward display but in visiting the fatherless and widows in their affliction and keeping oneself unspotted from the world (James 1:27). When we serve the least of these, Christ says we serve Him (Matthew 25:40).

Above all, God cares about the condition of the heart. Love for Him and love for neighbor stand as the greatest commandments, the foundation upon which all else rests (Matthew 22:37-40). Without love, even the most correct practices become empty noise (1 Corinthians 13:1-3). He desires truth in the inward parts, humility instead of pride, mercy instead of sacrifice (Psalm 51:6; Micah 6:8).

When we see clearly what matters to God, it reshapes everything. We hold our convictions with humility where God gives freedom, and we stand with firmness where God has spoken plainly. We stop dividing over shadows and begin laboring together in the light. And in doing so, we reflect more fully the heart of Christ, who did not come to win arguments about forms, but to seek and to save the lost, to bind up the broken, and to make all things new.

___________

Lord, teach me to value what You value. Guard my heart from clinging to outward forms while neglecting inward truth. Fill me with love, with mercy, and with a passion for justice. Help me to walk humbly with You and to serve others as Christ has served me. Let my life reflect Your heart in all things. Amen.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

THE MINISTRY OF CHRIST

The ministry of Christ did not begin with noise but with nearness. He stepped into a world groaning under sin. He came not as a distant observer, but as Emmanuel, God with us (Matthew 1:23). He walked among fishermen and tax collectors, reached out to lepers others feared, and spoke words that pierced both the proud and the broken.

When He opened His mouth, heaven seemed to reach down toward earth, for He spoke as One having authority, unveiling the heart of the Father (Matthew 7:28-29; John 1:18). His ministry was not merely about teaching truth but embodying it, not only declaring light but shining as the Light itself (John 8:12).

Every step He took was marked by compassion. He saw the multitudes not as interruptions but as sheep without a shepherd, weary and scattered, and His heart moved toward them (Matthew 9:36). He fed the hungry, healed the sick, and restored the outcast, yet these works were never ends in themselves. They were signs pointing to a deeper healing, a greater bread, a more enduring restoration (John 6:35. His hands lifted the fallen, but His eyes always looked to the cross where the ultimate work would be finished.

His preaching carried both invitation and confrontation. He called sinners to repentance, not with cold distance but with a warmth that drew them near. “Come to Me,” He urged, offering rest for weary souls (Matthew 11:28-30). Yet He also exposed the emptiness of outward religion, rebuking hearts that honored God with lips while remaining far from Him (Matthew 15:8-9). In Christ, grace and truth were not at odds but perfectly joined, the kindness of God leading to repentance even as His holiness revealed sin (Romans 2:4).

At the center of His ministry was the kingdom of God. He proclaimed its nearness, not as a political uprising but as a spiritual reign breaking into human hearts (Mark 1:14-15). Demons fled at His word, storms obeyed His voice, and even death itself trembled before Him, for the King had come. Yet this kingdom advanced not through force but through surrender, not through domination but through transformation (Luke 17:20-21; John 18:36; Hebrews 1:8-9). Those who followed Him found that to lose their life for His sake was to truly find it (Matthew 16:24-25).

Still, every miracle, every sermon, every quiet moment with His disciples moved steadily toward one hour. The ministry of Christ cannot be separated from His suffering. He set His face toward Jerusalem, knowing the cross awaited Him, yet He did not turn aside (Luke 9:51). There, the Good Shepherd laid down His life for the sheep, bearing sin in His own body, reconciling us to God (John 10:11; 1 Peter 2:24). What appeared to be defeat became the triumph of redemption, as mercy and justice met and the veil was torn (Matthew 27:50-51).

And yet His ministry did not end at the cross. The empty tomb declared that His work was accepted, His victory complete. He rose, not as a memory but as a living Lord, commissioning His followers to carry His message to the ends of the earth (Matthew 28:18-20). Even now, He continues His ministry from heaven, interceding for His people, pouring out His Spirit, building His church (Hebrews 7:25; Matthew 16:18). The same Christ who walked the dusty roads of Galilee now walks among His people, present and powerful.

To behold the ministry of Christ is to see the very heart of God unveiled. It is to witness love that stoops, truth that speaks, power that saves, and grace that transforms. And it is not merely history to admire but a call to follow. For He still says, “Follow Me,” and those who do will find that His life becomes their life, His mission their mission, His love their song.

____________

Lord Jesus, draw me near to Your heart. Let me not only admire Your ministry but walk in it, shaped by Your truth and filled with Your compassion. Teach me to love as You loved, to serve as You served, and to trust You fully in all things. Keep my eyes on You, the Author and Finisher of my faith. Amen.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

THE EARTH IS ROUND (AND WHAT THAT MEANS)

There is certainty written into creation, a steady witness that refuses to be silenced. The earth, though walked upon as though it were flat beneath our feet, bears the marks of curvature in ways both subtle and profound. The Bible does not labor to prove what the eyes may learn, yet it speaks with a calm authority that harmonizes with truth. “He sits above the circle of the earth” (Isaiah 40:22), not as a poet grasping at metaphor alone, but as One declaring dominion over a creation vast and ordered. And yet, even apart from the verse, the horizon itself bends away from us, the ships vanish mast last, and the heavens turn with a consistency that speaks of design.

The mind, when left to wander honestly, finds itself pressed toward coherence. For God is not the author of confusion (1 Corinthians 14:33), and the world He made reflects that same order. Consider how the sun rises in differing times across the lands, and how night wraps the earth not in a single moment but in a gradual turning (Psalm 19:4-6; Ecclesiastes 1:5). These are not the workings of a flat and static plane, but of a globe turning faithfully beneath the hand of its Maker. And while men once speculated with limited tools, we now stand surrounded by evidence, from the movement of stars to the paths of flight, each whispering the same conclusion.

Yet this is not merely a matter of science or observation. It is a question of humility before truth. “The heavens declare the glory of God” (Psalm 19:1), and they do so in a language that invites both wonder and submission. The curvature of the earth is not an enemy of faith but a companion to it, a detail in the grand architecture of creation. Job was asked, “Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth?” (Job 38:4), and the question still humbles every generation that seeks to place its own understanding above the evidence set before it.

There is also a moral lesson hidden within this reality. The world is not as it first appears. What seems flat reveals depth. What feels still is in motion. And so it is with the soul. “We walk by faith, not by sight” (2 Corinthians 5:7), learning that immediate perception is not always the fullest truth. The rounded earth becomes, in this sense, a quiet parable, reminding us that God’s design often stretches beyond our first assumptions. Even the simplest truths require patience, observation, and a willingness to be corrected.

Still, one must not miss the greater point. Whether a man understands the shape of the earth or not, his standing before God is not determined by geography but by grace. “The earth is the Lord’s, and all its fullness” (Psalm 24:1), and upon this sphere walk souls in need of redemption. Christ came not to settle debates of form, but to seek and save the lost (Luke 19:10; John 3:17). Yet even here, the created world supports the message, for a globe speaks of universality, of a salvation not bound to one corner but extending to every tribe and tongue.

And so we return to where we began, not with argument alone, but with reverence. The earth is round, and in its roundness it reflects a completeness, a fullness of design that points beyond itself. Truth, whether read in the Bible or seen in creation, does not fracture when rightly understood. “Your word is truth” (John 17:17), and His works bear witness to the same. Let the believer then rest not in speculation, but in the harmony of what God has spoken and what He has made. For both testify together, steady and unyielding, to the wisdom of the One who formed them.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

WHEN HEAVEN SPEAKS AGAINST EARTHLY INJUSTICE

From the opening pages of the Bible, injustice is not hidden beneath religious language—it is exposed, named, and confronted by the living God. The Bible does not treat oppression as a distant abstraction but as a moral wound in the fabric of human society. And where injustice rises, God does not remain silent. He speaks, He warns, He judges, and He redeems. The story of redemption is, in many ways, the story of God stepping into human oppression with holy determination.

In the days of bondage in Egypt, the cries of slaves rose like smoke before heaven. Israel groaned under the whip of cruelty beneath the hand of Pharoah, whose power was built upon enforced suffering. Yet the Word declares that God heard their cries. He did not merely observe their affliction; He remembered His covenant. And into that system of oppression, God raised up Moses up, not as a politician, but as a deliverer sent by divine authority.

When Moses stood before Pharaoh, it was not merely a clash of personalities. It was a confrontation between divine justice and human tyranny. “Let My people go,” was not a suggestion but a decree from heaven itself. Pharaoh’s refusal was not just stubbornness—it was rebellion against the moral order of God. And the plagues that followed were not random calamities but judgments revealing that injustice cannot endure indefinitely under the gaze of a righteous God.

As Israel entered the land and formed a kingdom, injustice did not disappear—it changed shape. Power could now be abused not only by foreign rulers but by Israel’s own kings. One of the most piercing confrontations of injustice occurs when the prophet Nathan stood before King David. Through a simple parable of a stolen lamb, Nathan exposed David’s hidden sin and injustice. The king who had authority over nations was himself brought low by the Word of God, for no throne is beyond divine scrutiny.

This moment reveals a sacred truth: God does not measure justice by position or power, but by righteousness. Even the anointed king is accountable. Nathan’s words—“You are the man”—snap through Scripture like thunder in a courtroom, reminding every generation that hidden injustice will eventually be brought into the light of divine truth.

In the story of Esther, injustice takes the form of a genocidal decree against the Jewish people. Yet God’s providence works behind the scenes of political systems and royal courts. Esther’s rise to influence was not accidental, but appointed “for such a time as this.” Here, injustice is confronted not only by prophetic rebuke but by courageous advocacy, as one woman risks her life to intercede for the threatened people of God.

The prophetic tradition also burns brightly against injustice. The prophet Amos cries out against those who “turn justice into bitterness” and “trample the needy.” In his words, God rejects empty ritual when it is divorced from righteousness. Worship without justice becomes noise, and sacrifice without mercy becomes offense. The prophets reveal that God is not impressed by religious performance when oppression remains unchecked in the streets.

In the fullness of time, justice and mercy meet in the person of Christ. The Lord Jesus does not merely speak against injustice. He embodies divine righteousness walking among the oppressed. He touches lepers cast out by society, He speaks with those rejected by religious systems, and He confronts hypocrisy in places of authority. When He cleanses the temple, overturning the tables of exploitation, it is a declaration that God will not bless what corrupts His house.

The apostolic church continues this witness. In the Book of Acts, believers are commanded to care for widows, the poor, and the marginalized. When injustice arises even within the early church’s structure, it is addressed directly through appointed servants and communal correction. The gospel does not merely save souls—it begins to reorder human relationships under the lordship of Christ.

And so the witness of Scripture is unified: God is not indifferent to injustice. He is patient, yes, but never passive. He hears the cries of the oppressed, He confronts the arrogance of power, and He calls His people to reflect His righteousness in a broken world. To walk with God is to learn to love what is right and to resist what is wrong, even when it is costly.

Thus, the Bible leaves us with a searching question: will we stand where God stands? Will we speak where truth is silent? For the same God who confronted Pharaoh, who corrected David, who empowered Esther, and who came in the flesh in Christ Jesus, still calls His people today to be voices of righteousness in a world still groaning under injustice.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

MLK: LETTER FROM A BIRMINGHAM JAIL

On April 12, 1963, in Birmingham, Alabama, a preacher was placed behind bars not for violence, not for theft, but for the testimony of conscience. That man was Martin Luther King Jr., and what he would write in that jail cell would become one of the most enduring moral documents of the twentieth century.

His was not the pen of a politician seeking applause. It was the voice of a shepherd suffering with his flock—writing through injustice with a clarity sharpened by persecution. The atmosphere of Birmingham at that time was charged with tension, protest, and resistance to segregation laws that gripped the American South like iron chains upon the soul of a people.

The immediate context was the Birmingham campaign, a coordinated series of nonviolent demonstrations organized by the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. King and other leaders had come to Birmingham in April 1963 because it was considered one of the most segregated and violently resistant cities in America. The demonstrations were deliberately nonviolent, yet met with arrests, fire hoses, police dogs, and mass incarceration. King was arrested on Good Friday, April 12, 1963, while participating in these demonstrations, having been previously warned against continuing public protest.

It was in the Birmingham City Jail, under these conditions, that King received a public statement titled “A Call for Unity,” written by eight white Alabama clergymen. They urged him and other demonstrators to withdraw and wait for courts and negotiations to resolve the issue. From the world’s perspective, it sounded reasonable; yet in the furnace of injustice, it rang hollow to those suffering daily oppression.

It was this statement that became the catalyst for King’s response, written in margins, scraps of paper, and whatever could be found in confinement.

On April 16, 1963, King composed his reply—what history now calls “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.” It was not drafted in comfort but in constraint, not in academic quiet but in the noise of imprisonment. Yet even there, his mind moved with astonishing clarity, weaving theology, philosophy, and moral reasoning together. The letter would later be smuggled out and published, spreading rapidly across the nation, igniting both admiration and controversy.

The tone of the letter is both firm and sorrowful, like a prophet standing between judgment and mercy. King begins by explaining why he is in Birmingham at all, defending the legitimacy of “outside agitation” by pointing to the interconnectedness of injustice. In his reasoning, injustice anywhere threatens justice everywhere, for moral reality is not confined by geography. His argument is not merely political—it is deeply theological, affirming the conviction that humanity is bound together under the authority of a righteous God who sees all oppression.

He then addresses the accusation of extremism. Rather than rejecting it, he reclaims it. He speaks of being an extremist for love, justice, and truth, contrasting himself with those who are extremists for hate or oppression. In this way, the letter turns insult into testimony, and condemnation into confession of faith. His reasoning is not born of rage alone, but of a disciplined moral vision shaped by Scripture, conscience, and the example of Christ suffering without retaliation.

One of the most piercing sections of the letter deals with the concept of “waiting.” The clergy had urged patience, but King responds with the anguished voice of those who have waited centuries. He writes of broken promises, of delayed justice, of dignity continually postponed. In his argument, waiting becomes not a virtue but a form of continued suffering when justice is perpetually denied. Here his words rise with prophetic intensity, exposing the cruelty of indefinite delay when oppression is already established.

He also speaks of nonviolent tension—not as something to be avoided, but as something necessary to force moral confrontation. In his reasoning, tension is not the enemy of peace when it exposes injustice; rather, it is the necessary wound that precedes healing. Like a surgeon cutting to remove infection, nonviolent resistance creates a crisis so that society can no longer ignore what it has buried beneath comfort and indifference.

The letter is also deeply pastoral in tone. Though it is argumentative, it is not cold. There is grief beneath its logic, and compassion beneath its rebuke. One hears in it the heart of a preacher who longs not for destruction but for repentance and reconciliation. It is a cry that justice might kiss mercy, and that truth might finally break through hardened systems of injustice. In this way, it bears the tone of lamentation found in the prophets, where sorrow and hope are intertwined.

When the letter was released, it spread beyond Birmingham and beyond Alabama. It became a national moral confrontation, forcing America to look at itself not merely as a political system, but as a conscience under judgment. It would later be studied in universities, preached in churches, and debated in courts. Yet its deepest power is not in its historical influence alone, but in its enduring moral weight—the voice of a man in chains speaking more freely than many in palaces.

Even now, the letter stands as a witness that righteousness often speaks most clearly when it is opposed. It reminds us that truth does not always sit in comfort, but often writes in suffering, and that the voice of conscience may be imprisoned, yet never silenced. Like the prophets of old, King’s words still call the soul to account, asking whether justice has been delayed in our own time, and whether love has been restrained by fear.

And so the letter remains—burning yet steady, wounded yet unbroken, written in a jail cell but aimed at eternity. It calls every generation to consider whether we will wait for justice or walk toward it, whether we will excuse injustice or confront it, whether we will silence conviction or stand with it. In its essence, it is not merely a document of history, but a mirror held before the human soul, asking whether we will live as people of truth or merely observers of it.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

MLK: THE STEPS THAT LED TO THE CELL

Dr. King’s arrest on Good Friday did not come out of nowhere, but rose out of a city gripped by tension and long-standing injustice. Birmingham in 1963 was a stronghold of segregation, where laws and customs worked together to keep people divided, and where peaceful protest was often met with resistance and threat.

Into that setting came a deliberate effort to confront evil without violence, to expose darkness by the light of truth. The campaign was organized—prayerful and purposeful—calling for marches, sit-ins, and public witness. Yet the city responded with injunctions, attempting to silence the movement through the force of law rather than the persuasion of righteousness. It was in defiance of such an injunction—not out of rebellion against God but out of obedience to His higher moral law—that the march was undertaken.

On April 12, 1963, after days of preparation, he stood before the people not merely as an organizer, but as a preacher of righteousness. That morning, before stepping into the streets, he delivered a message that stirred the heart toward courage and endurance. He spoke of the cost of freedom, of the necessity of sacrifice, and of the call to stand firm without hatred.

It was not a political speech dressed in religious words, but a sermon rooted in conviction, urging men and women to walk in love even when opposed, to suffer if necessary, and to trust that truth would prevail. There was a solemnity in the air, a sense that what lay ahead would require more than resolve. It would require grace (Ephesians 6:13; 1 Corinthians 16:13).

Then came the march. He did not hide behind others but walked at the front, alongside fellow ministers and citizens, stepping into the full view of authority. When the officers moved in, there was no resistance, no struggle, only a steady surrender to the moment, reflecting the spirit of One who, when reviled, did not revile in return but committed Himself to the will of God (Matthew 26:52-53).

The arrest itself was swift, yet it carried the weight of history. He was taken from the streets and placed behind bars. He entered a place meant to confine, yet one that would soon amplify his voice beyond what the streets alone could have done. The charges were rooted in the violation of the injunction against public demonstration. The deeper issue was the unwillingness of a system to yield to justice.

So the jail cell became a stage upon which truth would speak with even greater clarity. What seemed like defeat became a doorway, and what appeared to be silence became a message that would reach far beyond Birmingham. What they meant for evil, God meant for good (Genesis 50:20).

Think about these circumstances. King did not stumble into suffering unprepared, but walked into it clothed in conviction, strengthened by the Word, and anchored in purpose. The sermon came before the trial, the surrender before the confinement, the obedience before the outcome. That’s a powerful way to live.

And so it remains for all who would follow Christ, that we are called not merely to stand when it is easy, but to stand when it costs. We must trust that God will use even the hardest moments to declare His truth and accomplish His will.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

MLK : A GOOD FRIDAY IN CHAINS, A GOSPEL IN INK

On April 12, 1963, in Birmingham, Alabama, a preacher walked into suffering with his eyes open. Martin Luther King Jr. was not arrested by accident, nor was he caught unaware. He stepped forward in deliberate obedience, knowing that the path of righteousness often leads through opposition.

It was Good Friday, a day already marked by the memory of another righteous Man who gave Himself into the hands of unjust authority. And in that moment, the shadow of the cross stretched long over the city, reminding us that truth has always been costly (1 Peter 2:21; Matthew 5:10).

Behind the cold walls of a jail cell, something eternal was being formed. What men intended as silence became a trumpet. What they meant as restraint became release. From scraps of paper and the margins of newspapers came words that would outlive the chains that confined him.

The letter Dr. King wrote was not merely a response to critics but a witness to conscience, a call to awaken hearts dulled by delay and indifference. It carried the weight of moral urgency, the ancient cry that justice must roll down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream, and that God has appointed a time when every matter will be judged (Amos 5:24; Ecclesiastes 3:17). In that narrow space, the voice of one man joined the chorus of prophets who had long declared that righteousness must not be negotiated away.

Yet what gives this moment its deepest power is not only its historical significance, but its spiritual pattern. For the servant of God has always found that obedience leads through suffering before it leads into glory. The cell in Birmingham stands as a reminder that faith is not proven in comfort but in conviction, not in applause but in endurance.

Trials are not interruptions to the Christian life but instruments in the hand of God, producing patience and shaping the soul into maturity (Matthew 5:10-12; James 1:2-4; Romans 5:3-5). There is a fellowship known only to those who bear reproach for what is right. It is a quiet communion with Christ Himself, who was despised and rejected, yet entrusted Himself to the One who judges righteously (1 Peter 2:23. In that sense, the jail cell became more than a place of confinement; it became a sanctuary where truth was clarified and courage was refined.

And what of us now, who stand far removed from that day, yet near to the same calling? The temptation remains to wait, to soften, to choose peace at the expense of truth. But the witness of that Good Friday still speaks. It reminds us that the heart must be governed by a higher law, that love does not remain silent in the face of injustice, and that Christ Himself calls His people to a costly faithfulness.

If His Word dwells richly within us, then His courage must rise within us. His compassion must move through us. His truth must be spoken by us. The chains may differ, the setting may change, but the call remains the same.

_____________

Lord, grant me a heart that does not shrink from obedience. Teach me to stand in truth with gentleness and courage. Let me not delay where You have spoken, nor remain silent where You have called me to act. Form Christ within me, that I may walk faithfully, even when the path is costly, and trust You with the outcome. Amen.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

CHRIST IN THE HUMAN HEART

The truth is deeper than the oceans and higher than the heavens: that the Son of God would not only walk among men but would make His dwelling within them. The heart that once wandered in darkness becomes a habitation of light when Christ enters in.

This is not mere sentiment or religious language, but a living reality. The one who believes is joined to Him in spirit, and the life of Jesus begins to pulse within the inner man (Galatians 2:20; Colossians 1:27). What once was ruled by sin and self is now claimed by a greater King. Though the battle remains, a new presence abides, quiet yet powerful, reshaping desires, renewing thoughts, and bending the will toward God.

Christ in the heart is not an ornament but a transformation. He does not come to decorate the old life but to crucify it and raise something new in its place. The old affections begin to lose their grip, and new longings awaken, a hunger for righteousness, a thirst for God, a love for what is holy.

This inward work is often hidden from the eyes of men. Yet it reveals itself in patience where there was once anger, in humility where pride once reigned, in steadfast hope where despair had taken root. The heart becomes a garden where Christ Himself walks—pruning, planting, and bringing forth fruit in due season.

Yet the presence of Christ within does not remove the necessity of daily surrender. The heart is His dwelling, but it must also be His throne. There are chambers we are tempted to keep closed—places of fear, bitterness, or secret sin. But His lordship calls for full entrance, not partial welcome (Luke 9:23).

As we yield these hidden rooms, His peace spreads, His joy deepens, and His authority is felt not as a burden but as freedom. To have Christ in the heart is to live in continual communion, to walk through the day with an unseen Companion whose voice guides and whose presence steadies.

And what is the end of this indwelling Christ but glory? The same Jesus who resides in the believer now is preparing that soul for eternal fellowship with Him. His presence is both the guarantee and the beginning of what is to come, a foretaste of heaven placed within the fragile vessel of the human heart. One day faith will give way to sight. But even now the heart that holds Christ holds eternity itself, and the quiet work within will one day burst forth in radiant fullness.

____________

Lord Jesus, dwell richly within me and take full possession of my heart. Open every hidden place and rule over every thought and desire. Let Your life be seen in me, not in word only but in truth and power. Amen.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

CHRIST OUR JOY

There is a joy that flickers and fades with circumstance, rising and falling like the tide. And there is a joy that abides, steady and unshaken, rooted not in what we possess, but in who Christ is. This joy is not born of ease, nor sustained by comfort, but flows from union with Him, the risen Lord who does not change. It is the joy of the redeemed heart, anchored beyond the reach of trial. It is joy that remains even when tears fall, because its source is eternal (John 15:11; 1 Peter 1:8; Romans 15:13).

Christ Himself is our joy, not merely the giver of it, but its very substance. To know Him is life, and to walk with Him is gladness that the world cannot give or take away. When the apostle spoke of rejoicing, it was not from a place of ease, but from chains, from hardship, from a life poured out in service (Philippians 1:18; 2 Corinthians 6:10). This joy does not ignore suffering; it transforms it, turning sorrow into a deeper fellowship with Christ. He Himself endured the cross for the joy set before Him (Hebrews 12:2).

The world chases happiness in fleeting things—in possessions, in praise, in moments that quickly pass. Yet the heart remains restless until it rests in Christ, for He is the treasure hidden in the field, the pearl of great price, worth the surrender of all things (Matthew 13:44). When He is seen rightly, all else finds its place, and the soul is satisfied—not because life is easy, but because Christ is enough.

This joy is sustained by abiding in Him, by remaining in His Word, by walking in the light of His presence day by day. It is not a feeling to be chased, but a reality to be lived, cultivated through communion with Christ, through prayer, through trust in His promises. Even in the ordinary moments, even in the unseen struggles, there is a quiet gladness that rises from the assurance that we are His, and He is ours (Romans 8:38-39).

And this joy looks forward as well as upward, for it is strengthened by the hope of what is to come: the day when faith will give way to sight, and sorrow will be swallowed up in glory (Revelation 21:4). The joy we now taste in part will then be full—unhindered, unbroken—as we behold Him face to face and dwell in His presence forever (1 John 3:2; Psalm 16:11; Matthew 25:21).

So let the heart return again and again to Christ, not seeking joy apart from Him, but finding it in Him. He is our portion, our delight, our everlasting gladness. In every season, in every trial, in every quiet moment, He remains. He is the unchanging source of a joy that cannot be shaken.

_____________

Lord Jesus, You are my joy, steady and unchanging when all else shifts around me. Teach me to find my delight in You, not in passing things, but in Your presence and Your promises. Amen.

BDD

Read More