Pastor Dewayne Dunaway hair and beard in a business suit standing outdoors among green trees and bushes.

ARTICLES BY DEWAYNE

Christian Articles With A Purpose For Truth.

Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

WE DIDN’T JUST MAKE THE BIBLE HARD—WE MADE IT SMALL

I used to wonder why God made the New Testament so difficult to understand—like a complicated puzzle we have to solve about the work and worship of the church. Why the endless arguments? Why the layers of systems, rules, charts, and categories? Why can’t we all just see the Bible alike?

Now I know the answer.

God didn’t make it complicated. We did.

The New Testament is not obscure; it is unsettling. It is not confusing; it is liberating. And freedom is always harder to accept than rules.

Jesus did not come to introduce a new religious code but to announce a kingdom. He did not speak in technical manuals for church structure; He spoke in invitations—“Follow Me,” “Abide in Me,” “Come to Me.” The apostles did not plant communities bound together by intricate constitutions, but living bodies animated by the Spirit of Christ. What made the gospel dangerous in the first century was not its ambiguity, but its clarity: people were actually free.

Paul says it plainly: “Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty” (2 Corinthians 3:17). Liberty—not chaos, but life released from fear, hierarchy, and performance. Yet liberty threatens systems built on control. So we explain it away. We turn living letters into locked rooms and living stones into fenced properties. We take the open-handed gospel and close it into tight fists.

The New Testament becomes “hard” the moment we insist it must protect our traditions. Suddenly simple phrases require footnotes; obvious freedoms demand exceptions; Spirit-led obedience must be managed lest it disrupt the order we have carefully constructed. What once read like good news begins to feel like a legal document—parsed, restricted, and defended.

Jesus warned us this would happen. He rebuked those who “bind heavy burdens, hard to bear, and lay them on men’s shoulders” (Matthew 23:4). The burden was never Scripture; the burden was what men did with it. The same gospel that set captives free became, in the wrong hands, a means of captivity.

When we read the New Testament without fear—without the need to control outcomes—it becomes astonishingly clear. Christ is enough. The Spirit leads. Love fulfills the law. Gifts are given freely. People are transformed from the inside out. The church grows not by regulation, but by resurrection life flowing through ordinary believers.

We don’t all see the Bible alike because freedom exposes us. It asks us to trust Christ more than our systems, the Spirit more than our structures, and grace more than our boundaries. And that is costly. Rules protect us from risk; freedom calls us into it.

The New Testament is not a puzzle meant to keep us guessing. It is a doorway meant to be walked through. The tragedy is not that Scripture is unclear, but that we often prefer captivity with certainty to freedom with faith.

God didn’t make His Word complicated.

He made His people free.

__________

Lord Jesus, forgive us for the ways we have complicated what You made alive. Teach us to trust Your Spirit, to rest in Your sufficiency, and to walk in the freedom You purchased with Your blood. Deliver us from fear disguised as faith, and lead us into the liberty of loving You and one another fully. Amen.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

PHOEBE: THE WOMAN PAUL CALLED A DEACON, A PATRON, AND A TRUSTED MINISTER

Few figures expose our assumptions about women in the church more clearly than Phoebe. She appears briefly in Scripture, yet the weight of Paul’s language, the cultural setting, and the task entrusted to her together form an unshakeable testimony: the early church not only permitted women to minister—it depended on them.

Paul introduces her at the climax of his greatest theological letter:

“I commend to you Phoebe our sister, who is a servant of the church in Cenchrea, that you may receive her in the Lord in a manner worthy of the saints, and assist her in whatever business she has need of you; for indeed she has been a helper of many and of myself also” (Romans 16:1–2, NKJV).

This is not polite praise. It is apostolic endorsement.

First, Phoebe is called a servant—the Greek word is diakonos (Romans 16:1). This is the same word Paul uses for himself (2 Corinthians 6:4), for Timothy (1 Timothy 4:6), and even for Christ (Romans 15:8). When English translations soften the term to “servant” here but retain “minister” or “deacon” elsewhere, the change is theological, not lexical.

Paul did not invent a lesser category for Phoebe. He placed her squarely in the recognized ministry of the church at Cenchrea. If diakonos means minister when applied to men, it cannot suddenly mean something else when applied to a woman—unless Scripture is being bent to preserve tradition.

Second, Phoebe is described as a helper—but again the English masks the force of the Greek. Paul says she was a prostatis of many, including himself (Romans 16:2). This word does not mean casual assistance; it refers to a patron, protector, benefactor—someone who stands before others with authority, resources, and responsibility.

In the Roman world, a prostatis exercised leadership, influence, and public standing. Paul, an apostle to the Gentiles, humbly places himself among those who benefited from her ministry. That single admission collapses the idea that women in the apostolic church merely worked behind the scenes.

Third—and most overlooked—Phoebe was almost certainly the carrier of the Epistle to the Romans. Paul does not simply greet her; he formally commends her to the Roman churches and instructs them to receive her and assist her in her mission (Romans 16:1–2).

In the ancient world, the letter carrier was not a mail courier; the carrier was the authorized representative of the author. They explained the letter, answered questions, clarified meaning, and defended its contents. This means the first public exposition of Romans—the deepest theological work in the New Testament—likely came from the lips of a woman.

Paul trusted Phoebe with doctrine, with authority, and with his own reputation.

This does not stand alone. The same chapter names Priscilla, who taught Apollos theology “more accurately” alongside her husband (Acts of the Apostles 18:26); Junia, “outstanding among the apostles” (Romans 16:7); and multiple women whom Paul says “labored” in the Lord—a term he uses elsewhere for gospel ministry (Romans 16:6, 12; compare 1 Corinthians 15:10). Phoebe is not an exception; she is a clear example.

Most importantly, none of this contradicts Paul’s theology of Christ. In fact, it flows directly from it. In Christ, authority is not rooted in gender but in calling, gifting, and faithfulness. Paul himself declares, “There is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (Galatians 3:28). This is not a denial of distinction but a declaration of equal standing and equal access to service in the body of Christ.

Phoebe stands as living proof that the early church recognized what heaven had already affirmed. She ministered because Christ had called her; she led because the Spirit had equipped her; she was honored because her labor bore fruit. Scripture does not apologize for this—and neither should we.

To restrict women where the apostles did not is not faithfulness to Scripture; it is fear of its implications.

Phoebe does not ask for permission. She arrives with authority already granted—by Paul, by the church, and by the Lord Himself.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

IF YOU WANT TO GET TECHNICAL ABOUT PHOEBE

If we are going to talk about Phoebe honestly, we must let Paul speak in his own technical language, not ours. Romans 16:1-2 is not casual greeting; it is formal commendation, written with care, precision, and purpose. Paul knows exactly what he is saying—and exactly what his words will require of the churches who hear them.

“I commend to you Phoebe our sister, who is a servant (diakonos) of the church in Cenchrea…for indeed she has been a helper (prostatis) of many and of myself also” (Romans 16:1-2).

The word diakonos does not mean “helpful person.” It is the same word Paul uses for himself, for Timothy, for Apollos, and even for Christ (Romans 15:8; 1 Corinthians 3:5; 2 Corinthians 6:4; 1 Timothy 4:6). Greek offers no diminished, informal, or feminine version of the term.

When translators soften it to “servant” here but allow “minister” or “deacon” elsewhere, the shift is theological, not grammatical. Paul places Phoebe squarely within the recognized ministry of the church at Cenchrea, without qualification or apology.

But Paul goes further. He calls Phoebe a prostatis. This is not a vague compliment. In the Greco-Roman world, a prostatis was a patron—one who stood before others on their behalf. Patrons provided resources, protection, influence, and advocacy. They opened doors, secured legal and social standing, and made movements possible.

This was leadership exercised through provision and authority, not silent assistance. Paul openly includes himself among those who benefited from Phoebe’s patronage. That admission alone dismantles any attempt to relegate her role to the margins.

This also explains why Paul issues a formal commendation. He instructs the Roman churches to receive Phoebe “in the Lord” and to assist her in whatever matter she requires (Romans 16:2). Such language is not polite courtesy; it is the standard formula for an authorized representative.

In the ancient world, the carrier of a letter was not a courier but an emissary. The carrier read the letter aloud, explained its meaning, answered questions, and defended the author’s intent. If Phoebe carried the Epistle to the Romans—and all historical indicators suggest she did—then the first public exposition of Paul’s most theologically dense letter likely came from a woman.

That fact is often overlooked because its implications are uncomfortable. Yet nothing about it conflicts with Paul’s theology. On the contrary, it flows naturally from it. Authority in the body of Christ is grounded in calling and gifting, not gender. The early church functioned on that assumption long before later generations attempted to narrow it.

Phoebe is not presented as an exception. She appears in a chapter filled with women who labored in the Lord, taught doctrine, hosted churches, and were named with honor alongside apostles and co-workers. The idea that women were barred from meaningful authority is not derived from Romans 16; it is imposed upon it.

If we want to get technical about Phoebe, we must face the technical realities. Paul calls her a minister. Paul names her a patron. Paul entrusts her with authority. And Paul expects the churches to recognize what he already knows—that God had placed real responsibility, influence, and leadership in her hands.

Scripture does not apologize for this. It simply records it.

And that is what makes the case not merely persuasive, but precise.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

THE TEMPLE BUILT IN PEACE

David was a man after God’s own heart—brave, faithful, anointed, and beloved; yet his hands were stained with blood. He fought the Lord’s battles, subdued enemies, secured the borders, and gathered the materials—but he was not permitted to build the house where God would dwell (1 Chronicles 22:7-8).

The Temple was not to rise from the noise of war, but from the quietness of rest. That task was reserved for Solomon, whose very name is drawn from shalom—peace—“a man of rest,” to whom God promised peace and quietness on every side (1 Chronicles 22:9-10).

The distinction is not accidental. God was preaching a sermon through history: His dwelling place would be established not by conquest, but by peace.

In this, the Lord was already casting the shadow of Christ. David is a true type—the warrior king who defeats the enemies of God; Solomon is also a true type—the prince of peace who builds the house of God.

Yet neither alone is the fullness. Jesus fulfills them both. He fights the greater battle at the cross, disarming principalities and powers (Colossians 2:15), and then He builds His Temple—living stones joined together—by making peace through the blood of His cross (Colossians 1:20).

The Church is not built in the fury of human strength, but in the stillness of reconciliation. “For He Himself is our peace” (Ephesians 2:14). God does not dwell where swords still clash; He dwells where rest has been secured. The Temple, whether stone or flesh, belongs to the reign of peace.

Lord Jesus, Prince of Peace, thank You for fighting the battle we could never win and for building a dwelling place for God within us. Teach us to rest in Your finished work, to walk in Your peace, and to become living stones in the house You are still building. Amen.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

JESUS IN 2 CHRONICLES

2 Chronicles does not move forward in a straight line; it rises and falls like a breathing chest—revival, decline, repentance, mercy. Kings come and go, some faithful, many forgetful, and through it all the question remains unspoken but unavoidable: Who will finally lead the people back to God?

Jesus is present here not as a distant promise, but as the answer implied by every failure. Each broken reign creates space for a better King—one who will not merely reform the nation, but heal the human heart (2 Chronicles 12:14; Jeremiah 17:9).

The glory of God fills the temple under Solomon, so thick and weighty that the priests cannot stand to minister. Heaven touches earth, and God declares that His name will dwell there (2 Chronicles 5:13-14; 2 Chronicles 7:1-3).

Yet that same glory will later depart—not because God is weak, but because the people grow hard. Jesus is the glory that returns—not to a building of stone, but clothed in flesh. What once filled the temple for a moment now walks among us full of grace and truth (John 1:14).

Again and again, 2 Chronicles emphasizes a strange but holy pattern: when the king humbles himself, mercy follows. When pride reigns, ruin is near. From Rehoboam to Hezekiah to Josiah, the lesson is repeated until it aches. Jesus fulfills this pattern completely—not merely humbling Himself as a king, but emptying Himself as God. His crown is thorns before it is glory; His throne is a cross before it is heaven (2 Chronicles 7:14; Philippians 2:5–8).

The book ends not with triumph, but with exile—and yet, with an unexpected door left open. Cyrus, a pagan king, proclaims freedom and calls the people home (2 Chronicles 36:22-23). The story closes with return promised but not yet complete. Jesus steps into that unfinished ending. He is the true Deliverer who leads a greater exodus—from sin, death, and separation—bringing us home to God at last (Luke 4:18; Hebrews 4:9).

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

JESUS IN 1 CHRONICLES

At first glance, 1 Chronicles feels like a long corridor of names—genealogy after genealogy, generations carefully preserved. But this is not wasted ink; it is sacred witness. These names are the slow drumbeat of promise, the deliberate tracing of a single scarlet thread leading to Christ. From Adam to Abraham, from Judah to David, the Spirit is saying: God remembers; God keeps His word. Jesus does not appear suddenly in the Gospels—He arrives carried on centuries of faithfulness (1 Chronicles 1:1; 1 Chronicles 2:10–15; Matthew 1:1).

David stands at the heart of the book—not merely as king, but as type and shadow. 1 Chronicles presents David not in his failures, but in his calling; not broken, but chosen. Here he is the shepherd-king, the man after God’s own heart, the one to whom covenant promises are spoken. Jesus is the greater David—the Son who reigns without end, whose throne is not secured by sword or strategy, but by righteousness and truth (1 Chronicles 17:11–14; Luke 1:32–33).

The temple also looms large in 1 Chronicles. Though David will not build it, he prepares for it—gathering materials, appointing priests, organizing worship. Everything is set in order for God’s dwelling among His people. In this, Christ is foreshadowed again—not only as the true Temple, but as the One who makes the dwelling of God with man possible. What David prepared in shadow, Jesus fulfills in substance (1 Chronicles 22:5; John 2:19; Ephesians 2:19–22).

Worship saturates the book—songs, instruments, choirs, and continual praise. 1 Chronicles teaches us that the kingdom of God is sustained not merely by rule, but by reverent worship. Jesus receives what David only arranged: the praise of all nations, the worship of hearts made alive. He is both the King we serve and the Song we sing (1 Chronicles 16:23–29; Revelation 5:9–13).

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

WHY I DO NOT ADVISE READING THE BIBLE LIKE ANY OTHER BOOK

I do not advise reading the Bible the way you would read a novel, a history text, or even great literature. Scripture is not merely read; it is received. It is not consumed in long, uninterrupted gulps, but taken like daily bread—slowly, reverently, with dependence. The Bible is living and active, and when we approach it as we would any other book, we risk handling a flame as though it were cold ink on a page (Hebrews 4:12).

One of the common mistakes I see is treating the Bible as a linear project to be completed rather than a revelation meant to shape us. This often leads people to spend months—sometimes years—camped almost exclusively in the Old Testament. While all Scripture is inspired and profitable (2 Timothy 3:16), not all Scripture functions the same way in the life of a believer at every stage. The Old Testament prepares the ground; the New Testament reveals the face. To dwell too long in the shadows without regularly returning to the substance can leave the soul burdened, confused, or subtly re-centered on law rather than life.

The Old Testament is Christ-shaped, but Christ-veiled. The New Testament is Christ-revealed. Jesus Himself said that the Scriptures testify of Him, yet those who searched them without coming to Him missed life altogether (John 5:39-40). When believers remain for extended seasons in genealogies, ceremonial laws, and national judgments—without the constant interpretive light of the Gospels and Epistles—they may begin to absorb weight without warmth, command without comfort, warning without wound-healing grace.

I have seen sincere Christians grow anxious, rigid, and introspective—not because Scripture failed them, but because they read it without balance. They learned much about God yet drifted from daily communion with God. Paul tells us plainly that the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life (2 Corinthians 3:6). This does not mean the Old Testament is dangerous; it means it must be read through the cross, through resurrection, through the indwelling Christ who now lives in us (Galatians 2:20).

The early Church did not live in a constant Sinai thunderstorm. They devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching—the proclamation of Christ crucified and risen (Acts 2:42; 1 Corinthians 2:2). The law was their tutor, but Christ was their home. The danger of prolonged imbalance is not intellectual error alone; it is spiritual misalignment. We begin to measure ourselves by performance rather than promise, by effort rather than faith, by distance rather than nearness.

Read the Old Testament—yes, deeply and reverently. But read it with Christ, through Christ, and alongside Christ revealed plainly in the New Testament. Let the Psalms teach you to pray, the Prophets teach you to hope, but let the Gospels teach you to behold—and the Epistles teach you to abide. Scripture is not a ladder we climb to reach God; it is a window through which we see the God who has already come to us in Jesus Christ (John 1:14).

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

HOLDING MONEY WITH OPEN HANDS

Money is one of the quietest tests of the heart. It rarely announces itself as an idol; it simply asks to be trusted. Scripture never teaches that money itself is evil—only that loving it is. “For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil” (1 Timothy 6:10). Money is a tool, a servant meant to be used wisely; it becomes a tyrant only when it takes the place of God.

Jesus spoke about money often, not because coins mattered to Him, but because hearts do. “Where your treasure is, there your heart will be also” (Matthew 6:21). Money reveals what we lean on when the future feels uncertain. It exposes whether our security rests in savings accounts or in the faithfulness of God. The issue is never possession, but position—who sits on the throne.

Scripture does not call us to abandon responsibility or despise provision. Wisdom plans. Diligence works. Stewardship honors God. “The plans of the diligent lead surely to plenty” (Proverbs 21:5). Faith is not recklessness dressed in spiritual language. Jesus Himself acknowledged daily needs—food, clothing, shelter—yet He warned us not to let those needs become our masters (Matthew 6:31-33). We are to handle money carefully, but hold it loosely.

The tension is this: money must be in our hands, but never in our hearts. God does not ask us to pretend bills do not exist; He asks us to trust Him more than our income. “Trust in the LORD with all your heart, and lean not on your own understanding” (Proverbs 3:5). That trust becomes visible when we give, when we obey, when we refuse to panic, and when we choose generosity over fear.

Jesus’ words are direct and searching: “You cannot serve God and mammon” (Matthew 6:24). Mammon is not just wealth; it is the promise that money whispers—I will take care of you. God makes the same promise, but unlike money, He keeps it. Finances fluctuate. Markets collapse. Jobs disappear. God remains. “My God shall supply all your need according to His riches in glory by Christ Jesus” (Philippians 4:19). Notice the source—His riches, not ours.

Giving is one of God’s great heart-correctors. It breaks money’s illusion of control. When we give freely, we declare that our future is not held hostage by what we keep. “Honor the LORD with your possessions, and with the firstfruits of all your increase” (Proverbs 3:9). Giving does not purchase blessing; it aligns us with trust. God is not impressed by amounts—He looks at surrender.

At the same time, Christ warns us against anxiety masquerading as wisdom. Worry is not preparation; it is prayerlessness turned inward. Jesus spoke tenderly to fearful hearts: “Your heavenly Father knows that you need all these things” (Matthew 6:32). The God who feeds birds and clothes lilies is not indifferent to rent payments or grocery bills. He invites us to bring our needs to Him, not carry them alone.

To use money without loving it is to see it clearly. It is temporary. It is limited. It cannot heal guilt, calm a conscience, or raise the dead. Only God can do that. Money can fund good works, bless others, support ministry, and meet real needs—but it was never designed to bear the weight of hope. That weight belongs to God alone. “Command those who are rich in this present age not to trust in uncertain riches but in the living God” (1 Timothy 6:17).

When money is submitted to God, it becomes peaceful instead of powerful. We work faithfully, give generously, save wisely, and rest confidently. We plan—but we pray more than we plan. We budget—but we trust deeper than numbers. We live with open hands, knowing that whatever passes through them ultimately comes from Him.

In the end, money is a test of allegiance. It asks quietly, Who do you trust? And every act of faith answers back: The Lord is my portion (Lamentations 3:24).

Father, teach me to see money clearly—to use it wisely without loving it wrongly. Free my heart from fear and my hands for generosity. Help me trust You more than provision, and obey You more than logic. You are my source, my security, and my peace. Amen.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

HE TAUGHT AS ONE HAVING AUTHORITY

Jesus stood among the stones of the temple courts, His voice carrying without effort, His words landing with unsettling clarity. The crowd leaned in, not because He shouted, but because something in Him compelled attention. He did not sound like the teachers they knew. He did not reason outward from tradition or anchor His claims in other men’s opinions. He spoke as though truth itself had taken on a human voice. The familiar frameworks cracked; the comfortable categories failed. It was as if a weight had entered the room—and everything lighter was forced to adjust.

They were accustomed to the scribes, men trained to quote, compare, and clarify. Their sermons leaned heavily on precedent—what Rabbi so-and-so had said, how another school interpreted the Law. Jesus did none of this. “He taught them as one having authority, and not as the scribes” (Matthew 7:29). Authority was not something He borrowed; it rested in Him. The Law did not stand over Him—He stood beneath its fulfillment and spoke as its source.

There was a gravity to His teaching that unsettled the heart. People felt exposed, not manipulated—summoned, not coerced. His words did not merely inform the mind; they addressed the soul. Some marveled. Others bristled. All sensed that God was uncomfortably near. Heaven was not being discussed; it was pressing in.

Then He crossed a line no rabbi would dare approach. He pronounced forgiveness. When a paralyzed man was lowered through the roof, Jesus did not begin with muscle or nerve or bone. He began with mercy. “Son, your sins are forgiven” (Mark 2:5). The room stiffened. The religious leaders knew exactly what this meant. “Who can forgive sins but God alone?” (Mark 2:7). Their theology was sound. Their blindness was tragic. God was standing in front of them, clothed in flesh, speaking the language of grace.

Jesus answered their unspoken objections with divine simplicity. “Which is easier,” He asked, “to say to the paralytic, ‘Your sins are forgiven,’ or to say, ‘Arise, take up your bed and walk’?” (Mark 2:9). Words cost nothing; authority costs everything. To demonstrate that He possessed authority on earth to forgive sins, He spoke again—and the man stood. Strength returned. Limbs obeyed. The miracle was not the point; it was the proof. The invisible verdict had been rendered first; the visible restoration followed.

This is always the order of Heaven. Forgiveness precedes healing. Reconciliation comes before relief. Jesus did not perform wonders to entertain curiosity or erase every ache of a fallen world. His miracles were signs—sermons acted out before human eyes. Nicodemus understood this when he said, “No one can do these signs that You do unless God is with him” (John 3:2). The signs pointed beyond themselves. They were windows, not destinations.

If Jesus had come merely to remove pain, Galilee would have known no sickness. Yet at the pool of Bethesda, surrounded by multitudes, He healed one man and walked on (John 5:2-9). This was not indifference; it was purpose. He did not come to perfect this age but to redeem a people for the age to come. Any gospel that promises uninterrupted comfort has misunderstood His mission.

Even the language of healing must be handled with reverence. “By His stripes we are healed” (Isaiah 53:5) speaks first and foremost of the disease beneath all diseases—sin. He bore our iniquities, not merely our infirmities. The wounds on His back were not a medical treatment; they were the cost of reconciliation. The healing He secured reaches deeper than flesh. It restores communion with God.

Truth like this has a way of correcting us gently, then thoroughly. Many of us have had to relearn things we once resisted—discovering that God’s heart is larger than our assumptions. Scripture reveals a God who delights in praise, in melody, in joy offered sincerely. “Speaking to one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord” (Ephesians 5:19). From David’s harp to Heaven’s harps (Revelation 5:8), God has never despised redeemed sound—only empty hearts. When light comes, humility must follow.

Jesus’ authority was not harsh; it was holy. His teaching unveiled truth, His miracles confirmed His identity, and His cross revealed the depths of both justice and mercy. He was not merely a teacher sent from God—He was God come teaching. He did not arrive to renovate the old world, but to make us new.

If you wish to know the heart of God, watch the order Jesus keeps. He forgives before He restores. He reconciles before He relieves. He speaks grace before glory. And one day, when the work is finished and the new creation dawns, the same authoritative voice will declare, “Behold, I make all things new” (Revelation 21:5).

Until that day, His words still carry weight.

He still teaches as one having authority.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

THE CUP HE COULD NOT SET DOWN

In the garden, beneath the weight of olive trees and midnight silence, Jesus fell to the ground and prayed words the universe had never heard before: “Father, if it is Your will, take this cup away from Me; nevertheless not My will, but Yours, be done” (Luke 22:42). The cup was not raised to His lips on Golgotha first—it was already pressed against His soul in Gethsemane. Whatever filled it caused the sinless Son of God to tremble, to sweat as though His very life were being poured out before the nails were ever lifted.

This cup was not merely the prospect of physical pain. History is crowded with martyrs who faced far worse bodily torment without flinching—burned, torn, impaled, fed to beasts—yet they sang as they died. Jesus knew Roman cruelty; He had seen it. But this agony was of a different order altogether. The cup held something no human had ever fully tasted and survived: the undiluted judgment of sin, the holy wrath of God against evil, gathered and concentrated into a single moment (Isaiah 51:17; Jeremiah 25:15).

Throughout the Scriptures, the “cup” is a symbol of divine judgment—measured, intentional, and unavoidable. To drink it was to stand where sinners stand before a holy God. And this is what made the night unbearable: Jesus was preparing to take the place of the guilty while being perfectly innocent. He who had never known sin was about to be treated as though He were sin itself (2 Corinthians 5:21). The cup was not cruelty—it was substitution.

Most terrible of all was what that judgment would require. Sin separates. It always has. From Eden onward, its defining consequence has been exile from God’s presence (Genesis 3:24; Isaiah 59:2). Jesus had lived from eternity in unbroken communion with the Father—no distance, no silence, no shadow. Now He stood on the edge of an experience utterly foreign to His being: the human horror of God-forsakenness. He knew what was coming, and the knowledge crushed Him.

This is why Gethsemane matters. Before the cross tore His flesh, obedience tore His will. The struggle was not between fear and courage, but between rightful horror and perfect surrender. Angels were sent to strengthen Him, not to remove the cup (Luke 22:43). The Father did not answer by sparing Him—but by sustaining Him. Love did not cancel the cost; it carried Him through it.

When the moment finally arrived, and darkness covered the land, the cup was drained to its last drop. The cry from the cross was not the despair of unbelief but the voice of the Substitute standing where we should have stood: “My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?” (Mark 15:34). This was not the dissolution of the Trinity, but the real experience of separation in His human soul, as judgment fell where mercy would be born.

He drank the cup so we would never have to. The judgment we deserved did not vanish—it was transferred. The separation we feared was endured in our place. Because He was willing to take that cup, we are offered another one—the cup of blessing, forgiveness, and restored fellowship with God (1 Corinthians 10:16; Psalm 23:5). Gethsemane teaches us that salvation was not easy, not symbolic, and not cheap. It was costly beyond language—and it was embraced willingly.

Lord Jesus, You saw the cup and did not turn away. You knew the darkness and still chose love. Teach us to see the depth of what You endured, and to live in grateful surrender to the grace You purchased at such a price. Amen.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

IF JESUS IS GOD, DID GOD DIE?

When people ask whether God died on the cross, the question itself forces us to slow down and think carefully about what death actually is. In Scripture, death is never defined as annihilation. It is not the extinguishing of being, but the breaking of communion—the tearing apart of what was meant to remain whole. From the beginning, death enters the world as separation: humanity from God, spirit from body, life from its source (Genesis 2:17; Isaiah 59:2).

Jesus of Nazareth is not merely a man acting on God’s behalf; He is God the Son clothed in human nature. When He was crucified, His body truly suffered and truly died. The Gospels are unambiguous—His strength failed, His breath ceased, and His body was laid in a tomb (Luke 23:46; John 19:33). There was no illusion, no symbolic death, no theatrical fainting. He died as all men die—physically.

Yet the Son of God did not cease to exist. The eternal Word cannot be extinguished, for He is life itself (John 1:4). The divine nature of Christ is uncreated and indestructible. While His body lay lifeless in the grave, the Son remained fully alive. This is why Peter can say that Christ was “put to death in the flesh but made alive by the Spirit” (1 Peter 3:18). His humanity passed through death; His deity did not.

This distinction matters most when we consider what Christ endured beneath the weight of sin. On the cross, Jesus bore what humanity deserved—not merely physical suffering, but the horror of estrangement from God. The One who had eternally known unbroken fellowship with the Father entered, in His human experience, the darkness sin produces. That cry of abandonment was real agony, not a theological metaphor (Psalm 22:1; Matthew 27:46). Yet even here, the Trinity was not fractured. The Father did not cease to love the Son, and the Son did not cease to be God. What was broken was the human experience of communion, not the divine nature itself.

Even in death, Jesus remained sovereign. He did not drift into nothingness; He entrusted Himself to the Father (Luke 23:46). His spirit did not sleep in oblivion but went where the righteous dead awaited redemption. This is why He could speak with confidence of life beyond the grave and promise it to others (John 11:25–26).

All of this brings the question home to us. Every person will face death, and every soul will pass beyond the limits of the body. Scripture offers no third destination, no neutral ground. We are either reconciled to God through Christ or remain separated from Him by sin (John 3:18; 2 Corinthians 5:10). The cross stands at the center of that decision. Jesus entered death so that death would not have the final word over us.

Because Christ died—and rose—death is no longer a wall but a doorway for those who belong to Him. The same Spirit who raised Jesus now gives life to all who trust in Him, both now and forever (2 Corinthians 4:14; Romans 6:5). God did not die in the sense of ceasing to exist. Rather, God in Christ passed through death, shattered its power, and returned victorious—so that we might live.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

THE SPIRIT OVER LEGALISM

We have to ask ourselves, honestly: where has all our orthodox teaching, our careful doctrines, our polished sermons really gotten us? The world is not better for it. It groans under the weight of hatred, pride, injustice, and confusion. Wars rage, hearts harden, and souls wander. And yet, too often, the church sits on the sidelines, arguing over minor points while the spirit of God waits to be followed.

It is not merely the devil at work—though he schemes and deceives. No, much of the rot comes from within. We have cultivated legalism, rules, systems, and rigid formulas that bind people rather than free them. We have made salvation a checklist, righteousness a performance, love conditional. We have confused human effort with the Spirit’s work, and in doing so, we have made the gospel small, manageable, and safe—when it was meant to be wild, freeing, and unstoppable.

Perhaps what we need is not more rules, more traditions, more theological precision, but a return to simple surrender. A willingness to let the Spirit lead, to follow Him with humility, with obedience, with hearts open like children. Not a complicated religion, but a living, breathing faith—responsive, tender, immediate. This is the way Jesus taught: the Spirit over the law, mercy over ritual, love over judgment.

We have to ask ourselves if we are willing to take our share of responsibility. Every time the church fails to walk in Spirit-led simplicity, every time we substitute ceremony for compassion, every time we elevate human systems above God’s guidance, we are partly to blame for the brokenness around us. The world does not only suffer because of sin in the streets—it suffers because of our sin in the pews.

Legalism kills. It blinds. It hardens hearts and chokes out life. It convinces people that Christianity is about rules, fear, and perfection rather than grace, freedom, and love. And the most tragic part is that the world looks at our faith and sees the shadow of Christ’s love instead of the reality of it.

The call is clear: we must return to the simplicity of surrender, to walking in the Spirit, to living the gospel in such a way that it cannot be mistaken for anything else. We must let go of our need to control, to prove, to perform, and let God work in us and through us. It is not complicated; it is radical, it is daring, it is true.

Christ’s kingdom grows not through human ingenuity but through surrendered hearts. The Spirit moves where He is wanted, welcomed, trusted, and obeyed. Every rigid doctrine, every legalistic system, every attempt to humanly manage the gospel only slows it down, only muffles the song, only dims the light.

If the church is to be the salt and the light, we must first let go of our control. We must repent of legalism, confess our failures, and return to the simplicity of faith, love, and obedience. Only then can the Spirit do what the law cannot: transform hearts, change communities, and bring true freedom and life.

The world groans, and we must respond—not with more rules, not with more orthodox arguments, but with the living, breathing, Spirit-led power of Christ. The way is simple: surrender, trust, obey, and let Him do the rest. The rest is His work.

Lord Jesus, forgive us for the legalism that binds us and others. Teach us to walk in the Spirit with simplicity, with trust, with hearts fully surrendered. Let Your love flow freely through us, unrestrained by rules, unchoked by human effort, and may our lives point to You alone. Amen.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

THE GOSPEL IN SONG: “JESUS, LOVER OF MY SOUL”

The hymn Jesus, Lover of My Soul has carried hearts for generations; written by Charles Wesley in the 18th century, it rises gently, tenderly, like a prayer sung aloud. Its melody in every version—from old-time organ settings to modern acoustic arrangements—lifts the soul, echoing the deep longing of humanity for refuge and peace. The song itself is simple, yet profound; the words flow with sincerity, capturing desperation, hope, and the steady, unshakable love of Christ.

It begins in the honest ache of the human heart: “Hide me, O my Savior, hide, till life’s storm passes by.” How often do we feel the storms pressing in—trials, doubts, weariness? Wesley gives voice to the soul that trembles, that cannot hold itself upright without the hand of Jesus. And the song meets that trembling not with guilt, but with the promise of His steadfast presence.

Jesus is not distant in this hymn. He is Lover, He is Shield, He is Refuge. Every line paints Him close, personal, and powerful: the one who lifts us when we cannot rise, the one who shelters us when fear and sorrow threaten to overwhelm. The song points to the gospel with every verse; it reminds us that our salvation is not earned by effort, that our safety does not rest on our own strength, but on Him who alone can save and sustain.

The hymn invites trust. It calls the weary heart to cling to the unchanging Christ, even in the midst of storms. Wesley understood that salvation is both eternal and present; it is a reality not only beyond this life but in the very moment when despair presses in. The song becomes a prayer of surrender, a declaration of dependence, a meditation on the faithfulness of God whose love never fails.

And the beauty of it is in the simplicity. No ornate phrases, no complicated theology—just the human heart meeting the divine, longing for rest, and finding it. To sing Jesus, Lover of My Soul is to practice faith; it is to acknowledge weakness and receive strength, to admit fear and find courage, to voice need and discover provision. Each rendition carries the listener into a quiet sanctuary of the heart, a place where grace flows freely, where mercy finds its mark, and where Christ Himself becomes the anchor of the soul.

In every version of the hymn—whether the old organ, a modern piano, or a soft guitar—the melody serves the words; it rises, it falls, it cradles the listener. And in that musical embrace, the gospel speaks: Jesus is present, He is able, He is enough. The song teaches devotion, reliance, and awe. It does not merely tell of Christ’s love—it invites us to receive it, to abide in it, to be carried by it through every trial, every doubt, every storm.

Lord Jesus, Lover of my soul, I bring my trembling, my weariness, my need, and I lay it at Your feet. Hold me close, shelter me in Your love, and teach me to trust You fully. Let my heart sing of Your faithfulness and rest securely in Your embrace, today and always. Amen.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

JESUS: HISTORY’S UNDENIED FIGURE

It is remarkable, when you step back and look at the sweep of history, how certain facts stand unshaken even amidst debate and doubt. One of these facts is the existence of Jesus of Nazareth. Every reputable historian who studies the ancient world, the Second Temple period, or the early church agrees: Jesus lived. This consensus spans believers and skeptics, Jews and Christians, agnostics and atheists alike. His existence is not the point of contention; it is the foundation on which all discussion rests.

Where scholars argue is in the interpretation: Who did Jesus understand Himself to be? What did His teachings mean in the turbulent world of first-century Palestine? How should we understand the resurrection? These are the real questions, and the answers vary. Yet in all cases, the historical presence of Jesus is never seriously doubted.

There are those, a small minority, called “mythicists,” who claim Jesus never existed. They write books, articles, and blogs, yet almost all are outside the mainstream of historical scholarship, rarely experts in ancient history, and often addressing popular audiences rather than rigorous peer review. Even agnostic historians of note, like Bart Ehrman, have repeatedly affirmed that denying Jesus’ existence is not a credible position.

Jesus’ life meets every historical test we use for figures of antiquity. Multiple independent sources reference Him, both Christian and non-Christian. He appears in early letters and writings, including Paul’s epistles within decades of His life. Even hostile witnesses, like Tacitus and Josephus, acknowledge His presence. He fits into the broader context of Jewish and Roman history with consistency and coherence.

The truth stands clearly: the debate has never been about whether Jesus lived. That fact is settled. The debate is about who He is. History points to Him; faith follows Him. And in that, Jesus remains alone—undeniable, unparalleled, and eternal, the figure who walks across the pages of history into the hearts of all who will receive Him.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

CHRIST AND HIM CRUCIFIED

“I determined not to know anything among you except Jesus Christ and Him crucified” (1 Corinthians 2:2). Paul’s words are not the sigh of a tired preacher who has given up on deeper things; they are the clear-eyed confession of a man who has found the deepest thing of all. After brilliance, after learning, after revelation, after suffering—this is where Paul plants his flag. Not in clever speech, not in philosophical systems, not in religious performance, but in a Person; and that Person nailed to a cross.

Paul preached Christ because Christ had first taken hold of him. The cross was not merely his message; it was his life’s axis. He could speak of justification, adoption, sanctification, resurrection hope—but never apart from the crucified Lord. The early church did not grow because it mastered technique; it burned because it clung to Christ. Their power was not novelty but fidelity; not innovation but incarnation—God made flesh, crucified, risen, reigning (Acts 2:22-24).

This is why the cross never becomes elementary in the Christian life. We do not move past it; we move deeper into it. At the cross, pride is silenced, guilt is answered, love is revealed, and God is known. There, the wisdom of God overturns the wisdom of the world, and the weakness of God proves stronger than men (1 Corinthians 1:18, 24). Paul knew that if Christ were removed from the center, everything else—however impressive—would drift into emptiness.

Yet Paul’s confession does not end in history alone; it presses inward. The Christ who was crucified outside Jerusalem now desires to dwell within His people. “Christ in you, the hope of glory” (Colossians 1:27). The Christian life is not imitation alone but participation. “I have been crucified with Christ; it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me” (Galatians 2:20). The same cross that saves us also reshapes us, until His life breathes through our obedience, our love, our suffering, our hope.

This is the heart of the early church—and the heart the church must never lose. When Christ is central, the gospel remains living, worship remains honest, and love remains costly. When Christ is peripheral, even orthodoxy can become hollow. Paul determined to know Christ crucified because he knew that everything God intends to do in us and through us flows from there—life out of death, glory out of surrender, resurrection out of the cross.

Lord Jesus, keep us near Your cross. Strip away everything that distracts us from You, and make Your life our life. Dwell within us, live through us, and let all we know be shaped by knowing You—Christ and Him crucified. Amen.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

THE GOSPEL AND THE SIN WE KEEP MINIMIZING — A REFLECTION ON RACISM

Some people insist that racism is not that big of a deal—that it belongs to another era, another generation, another problem altogether. Yet the gospel refuses to let us shrug it off. From Genesis to Revelation, the Bible confronts the human impulse to divide, elevate, exclude, and dominate; it exposes prejudice not as a social inconvenience but as a spiritual disease rooted in pride and fear. Long before modern language gave us terms for it, God was already naming it, judging it, and healing it.

The first gospel sermon ever preached dealt with this issue head-on. On the Day of Pentecost, Peter stood before a crowd made up of nations, languages, and cultures—and declared that the promise of salvation was not limited to one people group. “For the promise is to you and to your children, and to all who are afar off, as many as the Lord our God will call” (Acts 2:39). That phrase—afar off—was loaded. It echoed the prophets and hinted at Gentiles, outsiders, the ones long kept at arm’s length. The gospel burst into the world already crossing racial and cultural boundaries.

It did not take long for controversy to erupt. The early church almost fractured over the question of who truly belonged. Jewish believers struggled to accept Gentiles as equal heirs of grace; old divisions tried to baptize themselves into Christian respectability. Acts records sharp disputes, tense councils, and Spirit-led corrections (Acts 15:1-11). God made it unmistakably clear: salvation was not the property of one race, nation, or tradition, but the gift of Christ to all who believe.

The apostles pressed this truth deeper. Paul reminded the church that Christ Himself tore down the dividing wall of hostility, creating “one new man from the two” (Ephesians 2:14-16). In Christ, the categories that once defined superiority and exclusion lost their authority. “There is neither Jew nor Greek…for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (Galatians 3:28). Unity was not optional; it was gospel-shaped obedience.

And yet, here we are. The same sin keeps resurfacing—sometimes loud and violent, sometimes quiet and respectable. We rename it, minimize it, or excuse it, but Christ will not let us. Partiality is condemned without qualification (James 2:1-9). Hatred toward a brother or sister is called darkness, no matter how refined the justification (1 John 2:9–11). The gospel still confronts us where we are most comfortable.

Racism remains a problem today because the human heart still resists grace that levels us all at the foot of the cross. The good news is not that we can fix ourselves, but that Christ already has. He calls us to repentance, to humility, and to a love that reflects His own—wide enough to embrace the nations, deep enough to heal old wounds, and strong enough to expose our blind spots. The Bible has not moved on from this issue, because we have not; but neither has the mercy of God.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

CHRIST IN JOSEPHUS: ANSWERING THE OBJECTIONS AND STATING THE FACTS

When the ancient historian Flavius Josephus is mentioned in Christian discussion, the air often fills with questions—Did he really write about Jesus? Is the testimony authentic? Has it been tampered with?

These are fair questions, and the answers—when weighed carefully—show that Josephus gives us one of the earliest non-Christian references to Jesus Christ. The evidence may be debated, but it cannot be dismissed.

First, the Testimonium Flavianum in Antiquities 18 describes Jesus as a wise man, a doer of surprising works, followed by both Jews and Gentiles, crucified under Pontius Pilate, and still regarded by His disciples as alive after death.

Most scholars agree that the version we have today contains some later Christian embellishments—phrases like “He was the Christ”—but the core text is solidly recognized as authentic Josephus.

Even skeptical historians acknowledge that Josephus wrote something here about Jesus; a complete forgery is nearly impossible, given the consistent manuscript tradition and the fact that early critics of Christianity (like Origen) mention Josephus’ reference but note that Josephus did not call Jesus “the Christ.” That tells us two things: the passage existed, and certain phrases were added later.

Second, in Antiquities 20, Josephus gives a brief, uncontroversial reference to “James, the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ.” This text is universally accepted as authentic. No Christian scribe would need to invent such an incidental detail—it fits perfectly with Josephus’ style of identifying lesser-known figures by referencing better-known relatives. This one line alone confirms two undeniable facts:

  1. Josephus knew of Jesus,

  2. Jesus was known widely enough to identify James by association with Him.

This second reference essentially anchors the first. If Josephus casually refers to Jesus elsewhere, then it is historically reasonable that he mentioned Him earlier in more detail.

Third, objections claiming that Josephus “would never write about Jesus” overlook the obvious: Josephus wrote about many figures involved in Jewish affairs of the first century, including others who founded movements, caused disturbances, or gathered followings. Jesus fit the pattern of individuals Josephus would naturally comment on—especially given His execution under Pilate and the continued presence of His followers. Silence would be far stranger than mention.

Fourth, some object that Josephus, being a Jew and a Pharisee, could not have said anything positive about Jesus. But Josephus often described people neutrally or respectfully without affirming their beliefs. He praised John the Baptist. He spoke sympathetically about the Essenes. Describing Jesus as a wise teacher or miracle worker would not violate Josephus’ style; it simply reflects how Jesus was broadly perceived.

When all the dust settles, here are the facts that remain standing:

  1. Josephus mentions Jesus twice in works that survive in multiple manuscripts.

  2. One reference (Antiquities 20) is universally accepted as authentic.

  3. The other (Antiquities 18) is mostly authentic, with likely Christian additions.

  4. Together they form one of the earliest non-Christian confirmations of Jesus’ existence, execution, and following.

  5. Even secular historians—agnostic or unbelieving—accept Josephus as a historical witness to Jesus.

Thus Josephus does not give us theology, but he does give us history. He stands as an unwilling witness—an outsider, a Jew, a historian detailing the events of his people—and yet even from his distant vantage point, the figure of Christ emerges unmistakably. No fabrication, no pious invention—just a first-century historian acknowledging the presence of a first-century Savior.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

CHRIST STANDS ALONE AMONG RELIGIOUS LEADERS

There is a hush that falls upon the soul when we place Jesus beside the great figures of world religion; the comparison dissolves before it begins. Others point toward truth; He declares Himself to be the Truth (John 14:6). Others offer teachings; He offers Himself. Others speak of a path; He is the Way. He steps out of the shadows of history and stands in the full light of eternity, unborrowed, uncreated, unthreatened by the passing of ages.

Where Moses delivered the Law, Christ fulfilled it (Matthew 5:17). Where the prophets cried, “Thus says the Lord,” Jesus spoke in a voice that thundered, “But I say to you.” Where sages sought wisdom, He embodied wisdom; where philosophers searched for meaning, He was the meaning. No founder of any religion claimed what Jesus claimed—that before Abraham existed, He already was (John 8:58), that He shares the glory of the Father (John 17:5), that He alone holds the keys of death and life (Revelation 1:18).

What other teacher ever offered His own blood as redemption? What other leader rose from the grave and invited the world to examine the empty tomb? Others leave behind writings and legacies; Christ leaves behind a living kingdom—souls transformed, hearts reborn, men and women lifted from sin to sonship. Every other religious path asks us to climb; Christ descends to carry us Home.

And where all others acknowledged their own moral fractures, Jesus alone stands sinless (Hebrews 4:15). He never recalled a word, never apologized for an action, never retracted a promise. Perfect righteousness wrapped in human flesh—this is no mere man, no wandering rabbi with a handful of maxims. This is the Lord of Glory walking in sandals, speaking with the accent of Galilee.

So Christ stands alone—above prophets, above teachers, above sages, above kings. Not because the world placed Him there, but because heaven has declared Him there; because the Father has raised Him and exalted Him; because no one else bears the name at which every knee shall bow (Philippians 2:10). To study other leaders is education; to follow Christ is salvation.

Lord Jesus, lift my eyes to see You as You truly are—matchless, holy, and altogether lovely. Break every false hope, silence every competing voice, and draw my heart to rest in the One who stands above all. Teach me to love You, trust You, and follow You with an undivided soul. Amen.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

THE ANCIENT OF DAYS MADE SIMPLE

The phrase “Ancient of Days” sounds mysterious, but the Bible uses it in a very simple, beautiful way. It appears most clearly in Daniel 7, where Daniel sees God seated on a throne—eternal, wise, holy, and utterly above every kingdom that rises or falls. The title reminds us that God is older than time itself, uncreated, unchanged, and unshakable. Long before any empire marched, before any king ruled, before any problem troubled us, God already was.

To call Him the Ancient of Days is to confess that He stands outside the limits of history. Generations come and generations go, but He remains the same—steady, sovereign, and undefeated. Nations roar, rulers strut across the stage, and troubles rise like storms, but the Ancient of Days is unmoved. His throne isn’t up for election, review, or replacement. He rules with a wisdom that doesn’t age and a strength that doesn’t fade.

In Daniel’s vision, this Ancient of Days is not distant or abstract. He is a Judge who sees clearly, who knows perfectly, and who brings justice with righteousness that cannot be corrupted. His purity is pictured as white as wool, His authority blazing like fire. These images aren’t meant to confuse us—they’re meant to comfort us. They remind us that God’s rule is clean, fair, and everlasting. Nothing escapes His eye; nothing overturns His purpose.

We also see Jesus connected to this title. In the New Testament, Jesus receives the same authority, the same dominion, the same eternal kingdom described in Daniel 7. He is the One who approaches the Ancient of Days, and He is also the One who shares the very nature of the Ancient of Days. In Him we see the eternal God walking among us, the timeless King stepping into time for our salvation.

So when we talk about the Ancient of Days, we’re simply talking about the God who has always been there—before our fears, before our failures, before our world even existed. And this eternal God is not far away; He has drawn near to us in Jesus Christ, giving us hope that cannot be shaken and a kingdom that will never pass away.

BDD

Read More
Bryan Dunaway Bryan Dunaway

FREEDOM IN CHRIST

Freedom in Christ is not a slogan; it is the deep sigh of a soul finally allowed to breathe. It is the lifting of chains that were so heavy we forgot we were carrying them. It is the breaking open of a prison door we thought was welded shut. When Jesus steps into a life, He does not merely adjust our behavior—He sets us free, utterly and gloriously, from the things that once owned us.

Freedom from sin is the first miracle. Not the absence of weakness, not the disappearance of temptation, but the loosening of sin’s authority. The guilt that once clung to us like a second skin is peeled away, and the condemnation that echoed in our minds is silenced by the voice of mercy. “There is therefore now no condemnation…”—and the soul rises at last into daylight. Sin once ruled us; now it is a defeated master, a dethroned tyrant, robbed of its power by the cross.

And then comes freedom from man-made religion—those cages built of human opinions, traditions, pressures, and expectations. Christ tears through the false standards and the endless hoops and calls us back to a faith that breathes. Not performance. Not pretending. Not a checklist of rituals. He brings us to Himself, simple and unadorned. He frees us from the fear of disappointing people, from the weight of doing faith “just right,” and He whispers that His yoke is easy, His burden light, His grace more than enough.

Freedom from human bondage is another mercy—freedom from those who would control us, define us, diminish us, or speak chains into our identity. Christ tells us who we are: forgiven, beloved, redeemed, chosen. When His voice becomes the deepest truth in our hearts, no other voice can enslave us. We no longer bow to approval, no longer kneel before rejection, no longer build our futures on the shaky foundation of human opinions.

And then—perhaps the hardest of all—He grants freedom from the flesh. Freedom from the impulses that once drove us, from the self that demanded center stage, from the cravings that promised joy but delivered only emptiness. Christ does not leave us to wrestle alone; He gives us His Spirit, steady and quiet, reshaping desires from the inside out. He frees us not only from the acts of the flesh, but from its tyranny—its push, its pull, its endless tug-of-war. Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is real liberty, liberty that begins in the heart and works its way outward until even our habits begin to heal.

Freedom in Christ is not wildness; it is wholeness. It is not rebellion; it is restoration. It is the freedom to finally be the person God intended—washed, steady, forgiven, courageous, alive. Freedom to walk without shame, to breathe without fear, to love without caution, to trust without trembling. Freedom to belong. Freedom to hope. Freedom to rise again and again because grace never runs dry.

This is the freedom Christ gives—the freedom we could never build on our own. A freedom written in blood, sealed in resurrection, carried by the Spirit, and available to every heart that dares to believe.

Lord Jesus, thank You for the freedom only You can give. Free me again today—from sin’s pull, from man-made expectations, from the fear of others, and from the weakness of my own flesh. Teach me to walk in Your grace, steady and unafraid, resting in the freedom You purchased for me. Amen.

BDD

Read More