JESUS IN THE BOOK OF EZEKIEL

Ezekiel opens beneath a sky that refuses to stay closed. By the river Chebar, in exile and ash, the heavens are torn open and the glory of the Lord comes rushing down on wheels within wheels, fire enfolded in fire, life pulsing with order and purpose (Ezekiel 1:1-28).

This is not chaos; it is majesty on the move. Here we see Christ before Bethlehem—the sovereign Son who is not confined to temples or borders, whose throne is mobile, whose reign follows His people even into captivity. Jesus is already there, ruling from the whirlwind, reminding the exiles that displacement does not mean abandonment.

Again and again Ezekiel is addressed as “son of man” (Ezekiel 2:1). The title humbles the prophet, but it also lifts our eyes forward. When Jesus takes this name upon His own lips, He gathers Ezekiel’s weakness into His strength. The Son of Man who stands Ezekiel on his feet by the Spirit (Ezekiel 2:2) is the same Son of Man who will one day stand humanity upright by His cross. What Ezekiel hears in fragments, Jesus embodies in fullness—God speaking not only through a man, but as Man.

Then comes the valley—dry bones scattered beneath a silent sky (Ezekiel 37:1-14). No pulse, no sinew, no hope. Yet the word is spoken, the Spirit is summoned, and life returns. This is resurrection language long before an empty tomb. Christ stands here as the Life-giver, the One who does not merely improve what is broken but resurrects what is dead (John 11:25). Israel’s restoration foreshadows a greater miracle still: sinners made alive, graves turned into gateways, breath returning where death had settled in too long.

Ezekiel sees a shepherd promised, a king from the line of David who will feed the flock, seek the lost, and bind the broken (Ezekiel 34:23-24). This is Jesus unmistakably—the Good Shepherd who lays down His life for the sheep (John 10:11). He is not the hired hand, not the distant ruler, but the shepherd who enters the field, bears the wounds, and gathers the scattered. In Ezekiel, the promise is spoken; in Jesus, the promise walks among us.

The book closes with a river flowing from the temple, deepening as it goes, bringing life wherever it touches (Ezekiel 47:1-12). Trees bear fruit every month; leaves heal the nations. This river flows again in Revelation, issuing from the throne of God and of the Lamb (Revelation 22:1-2).

The temple is no longer stone and shadow—Christ Himself is the dwelling place of God with man. Ezekiel names the city “THE LORD IS THERE” (Ezekiel 48:35). In Jesus, that name becomes flesh. God is not merely there—He is with us.

BDD

THE BEST FRIEND WHITE AMERICA EVER HAD

In the stunned hours after Martin Luther King Jr. was murdered, Jesse Jackson spoke words that startled the nation and clarified the moment. Standing in the shadow of unspeakable loss, he said: “To some extent, Dr. King has been a buffer for the last few years between the white community and the black community. The white people do not know it, but the white people’s best friend is dead.”Those words were not accusation; they were revelation. Jackson was not lessening Black grief—he was unveiling a deeper tragedy. The bullet that killed King did not merely strike a movement; it removed the one man uniquely committed to rescuing white America from its own moral self-destruction.

What Jackson meant was this: Martin Luther King Jr. loved white America enough to restrain it from becoming what its worst instincts desired. King stood between righteous anger and national collapse. He absorbed the fury of the oppressed and translated it into a language conscience could still hear. He did not preach humiliation; he preached repentance. He did not seek the defeat of white Americans; he sought their redemption. He understood that injustice deforms the oppressor as surely as it wounds the oppressed—that hatred chains both, and that truth spoken in love is the only key strong enough to unlock them (John 8:32).

King’s nonviolence was not passivity; it was disciplined strength. He knew that violence might seize power, but it would poison the future. So he placed his own body—his credibility, his safety, his life—between rage and retaliation. In doing so, he bought the nation time: time to change without burning, to repent without being conquered. He was, as Jackson said, a buffer—not a shield for injustice, but a barrier against chaos. White America did not know it, but King was fighting for its soul, insisting it could be corrected without being destroyed.

And beneath it all stood the Cross. King’s vision was not born in politics but in Scripture. He believed that love is not sentimental but governing—that it disciplines power, restrains wrath, and opens the impossible door of reconciliation (Matthew 5:44–45). He trusted that light exposes darkness without becoming it (John 1:5). In loving his enemies, King mirrored the Christ who loved the world that crucified Him (Romans 5:8). Jesse Jackson’s words were not rhetoric; they were prophecy. When King died, America lost the man most committed to saving it from itself.

__________

Lord of truth and mercy, give us eyes to recognize our friends while they still speak; make us humble enough to be corrected by love, and courageous enough to walk the costly road of reconciliation. Amen.

BDD

IN THE BEGINNING WAS THE WORD

Language is so familiar that we rarely stop to notice how strange it is. We speak as easily as we breathe, yet speech itself is one of the deepest mysteries of human existence. Words are not objects. They have no weight, no color, no measurable substance. And yet they carry meaning—real meaning—capable of shaping thought, forming identity, and binding persons together across time.

No one has ever spoken without first being spoken to. This is not a poetic observation; it is a biological and philosophical fact. A child raised in isolation does not invent language. Sounds may be made, but meaning never appears. Vocabulary must be received. Grammar must be taught. Understanding comes only through prior communication. Language is inherited before it is expressed.

This presents a serious problem for atheism. Matter can vibrate. Air can move. Vocal cords can produce sound. But sound is not language. Language requires meaning, and meaning requires mind. Physical processes can explain how sounds are formed, but they cannot explain why sounds signify anything at all. No arrangement of atoms contains the instruction, “This noise means that object.” Meaning is not a property of matter; it is imposed by intelligence.

Every language presupposes a community of minds who already understand. Words only work because they point beyond themselves. They are signs, not substances. And signs only function where intention exists. A symbol without a mind is nothing more than a shape.

Scripture begins precisely where reason eventually arrives. “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God” (John 1:1). The universe does not begin with silence or randomness, but with communication. Not noise, but Word—reasoned, intentional, meaningful speech. The world is intelligible because it was spoken into being.

This is why human language works at all. We do not create meaning; we participate in it. We do not invent reason; we respond to it. Our words reflect a deeper Word. Our capacity to speak is a reflection, not an origin. “God…has spoken to us by His Son” (Hebrews 1:1-2). Before we ever spoke, we were addressed.

Atheism can describe the mechanics of speech, but it cannot account for meaning itself. It can trace sounds through airwaves and neurons, but it cannot explain why those sounds mean anything. Meaning is not survival-driven. Truth is not necessary for reproduction. And yet we seek truth relentlessly, driven by a hunger that transcends utility.

Language reveals that reality is not mute. It speaks. And because it speaks, we can listen. The human voice is not an accident of evolution; it is a signpost pointing beyond itself—to a world grounded in reason, to minds shaped for understanding, and ultimately, to a God who speaks.

BDD

JESUS IN THE BOOK OF JEREMIAH

Jeremiah stands weeping at the gates of a collapsing nation; yet his tears are not merely human sorrow—they are a window into the heart of God.

The prophet is called while still young, his mouth touched by divine fire, his life appointed to speak truth to a people who no longer wished to hear it (Jeremiah 1:4-10). Here already we glimpse Christ: the Word sent early, sent faithfully, sent not to flatter but to heal—even when healing must come by way of pain.

Jeremiah is not a detached herald; he feels the message he carries. So too Jesus, who did not simply announce judgment and mercy, but bore them in His own body and soul.

Jeremiah is often called the “weeping prophet,” yet his tears are not weakness; they are revelation. “Oh, that my head were waters, and my eyes a fountain of tears” (Jeremiah 9:1). These are not the words of a distant deity, but of a God wounded by covenant betrayal. When Jesus later stands over Jerusalem and weeps—“O Jerusalem, Jerusalem…” (Matthew 23:37)—the kindred sound is unmistakable.

Jeremiah shows us that divine judgment is never cold or mechanical; it breaks the heart of the Judge. Christ is that same heart, now clothed in flesh.

Again and again, Jeremiah speaks of a people trusting in externals—temple, ritual, heritage—while their hearts remain far from God. “Do not trust in these lying words, saying, ‘The temple of the Lord…’” (Jeremiah 7:4). Jesus will later overturn tables and speak of a temple not made with hands, but raised in three days (John 2:19-21). Jeremiah prepares us for this truth: God has never been impressed with buildings; He has always desired faithfulness. Christ is the true Temple, the dwelling place of God with man, the end of all shadows.

Then comes the deepest wound of all: betrayal by friends. Jeremiah laments those who shared his bread yet sought his harm (Jeremiah 11:18-19). This is no vague anticipation—it is a straight road to Gethsemane, to Judas’ kiss, to the lonely Messiah surrounded by enemies and abandoned by His own. Jeremiah’s suffering is not redemptive in itself, but it is prophetic in shape; it points forward to the Man of Sorrows who would fulfill what Jeremiah could only foreshadow.

Yet Jeremiah is not only a book of lament; it is a book of blazing hope.

In the darkest hour, when Jerusalem lies in ruins and exile seems final, God speaks of something entirely new: “Behold, the days are coming when I will make a new covenant” (Jeremiah 31:31-34). Not written on stone, not enforced by fear, but inscribed on the heart.

Here Christ steps fully into view. Jesus lifts the cup and says, “This cup is the new covenant in My blood” (Luke 22:20). Jeremiah announces it; Jesus accomplishes it. What was promise becomes person. What was hope becomes flesh.

Jeremiah buys a field while the city burns (Jeremiah 32:6-15)—an act that seems irrational, even foolish. But faith often looks foolish when it trusts resurrection more than rubble.

Christ does the same, in a far greater way: He invests Himself fully in a world that will kill Him, confident that life will rise from the grave. Jeremiah’s deed whispers what the cross will shout—God is not finished when judgment falls; He is just beginning.

In Jeremiah, we meet a God who refuses to let go, who disciplines in love, who promises restoration beyond ruin. In Jesus, we meet that same God, now reaching with nail-scarred hands. Jeremiah shows us the heart; Jesus is the heart made visible. The tears of the prophet find their answer in the blood of the Savior. Judgment and mercy meet—not in theory, but at a cross outside the city gate.

BDD

THE GREATEST AMERICAN WHO EVER LIVED

Most people speak of Martin Luther King Jr. as though he were a slogan—safe, sanded down, embalmed in quotation calendars and civic assemblies. They praise him just enough to avoid hearing him. They invoke his name while quietly emptying it of content, until the prophet becomes a mascot and the fire becomes a museum exhibit.

But King was not trying to be liked, and he was certainly not trying to be misunderstood so comfortably. He was attempting something far more dangerous: the moral conversion of a nation—and he refused to do it by hatred, flattery, or despair.

King did not misunderstand America; America misunderstood King. He knew exactly how deep the sickness ran, and he diagnosed it without anesthesia. Yet he would not amputate the patient.

Again and again, when rage would have been easier and violence more persuasive, he insisted that the disease could not be cured by killing the body. He said what few had the courage—or the faith—to say: “we must not give up on our white brothers and sisters.” Not tolerate them. Not defeat them. Save them. And that single conviction exposed how little most people understood his mission.

When King called segregationists his brothers, including George Wallace, he was not being sentimental; he was being biblical. He was refusing to grant hatred the dignity of finality. He would not let evil define identity.

This was not weakness—it was theological defiance. He understood that if you concede someone to irredeemability, you have already surrendered the Gospel. King knew that reconciliation is not achieved by humiliation, and justice is not secured by dehumanization. You do not cure blindness by gouging out eyes.

His vision was not political optimism; it was cruciform logic. He believed, with a clarity sharpened by Scripture, that suffering borne in love has a moral weight violence can never match. He believed that unearned grace disarms the conscience more powerfully than coercion ever could. This is why he could march without weapons, endure jail without bitterness, and speak to his enemies without contempt. He was not trying to win arguments; he was trying to awaken souls.

The Bible had already taught him this pattern. Joseph forgave brothers who sold him into slavery, not because the sin was small, but because God was greater (Genesis 50:20). Moses interceded for a people who wanted him dead, choosing mediation over vengeance (Exodus 32:11-14). Jesus wept over Jerusalem even as it sharpened the nails, refusing to abandon those who would abandon Him (Luke 19:41-44). King stood squarely in that tradition. He believed love was not an emotion but a force—moral, spiritual, historical.

What most people miss is that King was not calling America to feel better; he was calling it to repent. Repentance is not shame-management; it is a turning. And he knew repentance could only happen if people were confronted without being annihilated. That is why he insisted on nonviolence—not because violence was ineffective, but because it was counterproductive to redemption. He was not content to expose injustice; he wanted to transform the unjust.

This is why the phrase “the content of their character” was not a plea for colorblind naïveté, but a summons to moral maturity. Character is what the Gospel has always emphasized—the heart, the will, the inward man. “The Lord does not see as man sees; for man looks at the outward appearance, but the Lord looks at the heart” (1 Samuel 16:7). King was asking America to adopt God’s measuring stick—and that was far more threatening than any protest sign.

He understood something modern discourse desperately avoids: that enemies are not problems to be erased, but neighbors to be redeemed. “Love your enemies,” Jesus said, “bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you” (Matthew 5:44). King took that command seriously enough to build a movement on it. And in doing so, he revealed how shallow our moral imagination had become. We prefer justice without mercy, righteousness without reconciliation, victory without conversion. King would have none of it.

If this makes you uncomfortable, it should. A prophet is not sent to soothe but to unsettle. King’s greatness lies not merely in what he opposed, but in what he refused to become. He would not let oppression turn him into an oppressor. He would not let hatred recruit him. He believed—against the evidence of his eyes and the threat of his death—that love is stronger than fear, truth heavier than lies, and grace more durable than violence.

He was not perfect. No prophet except Christ is. But he was faithful to the vision that matters most: that America’s deepest problem was not race alone, but sin—and that its only lasting cure was moral regeneration. That is why his words still burn. That is why they cannot be safely archived. And that is why so many people praise him while quietly hoping no one actually listens to him.

The greatest American who ever lived did not ask us to clap; he asked us to change. And that demand still stands.

I write this not as a commentator borrowing someone else’s convictions, but as a citizen speaking his own. This is my article, on my website, written with full ownership of both the words and the judgment behind them.

I am an American, formed by this country’s promises and failures alike, and I freely state my conclusion without apology or hesitation: Martin Luther King Jr. is, in my estimation, the greatest American who ever lived. Not because he was flawless, but because he saw farther; not because he was safe, but because he was faithful to a moral vision that demanded repentance, reconciliation, and courage.

History may argue, pundits may posture, and critics may scoff—but this is my conviction, plainly stated and firmly held, and I stand by it.

BDD

THE GOSPEL IN FILM — WHAT DO WE LEARN FROM “THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE” (1974)

Nothing. Absolutely nothing.

I deem it good to look for redemptive tracks everywhere, trying to locate the Gospel in every corner of human expression. Music, art, science, politics, botany, even horror films are occasionally pressed into service as reluctant parables. But honesty requires us to admit something bracing and unfashionable: some things teach us absolutely nothing about the Gospel—except how far we are willing to wander from it.

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, released in 1974, is one of those things.

Let us be clear. This film offers no hidden Christ-figure, no sacrificial arc, no moral illumination disguised beneath the gore. There is no resurrection whispered through the blood, no light flickering at the end of the tunnel. If there is a sermon here, it is not preached by the film but against it. The message is not theological but diagnostic—a case study in the human appetite for emptiness, cruelty, and spectacle baptized as entertainment.

I once watched films with a critical eye, even made a little money doing it, and I watched this nonsense. And it was not disturbing in the way people often claim. The violence itself is almost beside the point. All one has to do is imagine the cameras, the directors, the lighting crews, the planning meetings, the collective decision-making that said, Yes—this is worth making. When you pull back the curtain, the horror is not the chainsaw; it is the imagination that thought this was meaningful.

The Gospel does not appear here as contrast by accident but by absence. The Word of God teaches us that depravity is not merely an act but a direction—a bent of the will away from God. “There is none righteous, no, not one” (Romans 3:10). When entertainment delights in emptiness and calls it art, we are not witnessing rebellion so much as boredom with goodness. Sin is rarely dramatic; more often it is tedious, repetitive, and profoundly stupid.

And that is the word that fits best here: stupid. Not morally complex. Not darkly insightful. Just stupid. Violence without truth is not depth; it is noise. Shock without meaning is not art; it is clutter. The film does not explore evil; it exploits it. It does not warn; it wallows. It does not illuminate the darkness; it turns off the lights and congratulates itself for the gloom.

The Gospel, by contrast, never glorifies depravity even when it names it. Scripture looks squarely at the human condition and refuses to sensationalize it. The Bible is brutally honest about sin, but always for the sake of redemption. The Cross is not spectacle; it is salvation. It is suffering with purpose, pain with meaning, death conquered rather than displayed.

If The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (and films like it) teaches us anything at all, it is by negative space. It shows us what happens when creativity is severed from truth, when imagination is detached from goodness, when freedom forgets its telos. It is Romans 1 without the hope—minds darkened, passions indulged, futility celebrated.

And here the Gospel speaks—not from the screen, but over against it. Christ does not shock us into awareness; He awakens us into life. He does not trade in blood for amusement; He gives His blood for atonement. He does not reduce humanity to prey; He restores humanity to sons and daughters.

Some things are not mirrors of grace. Some things are warnings. And wisdom knows the difference.

BDD

THE GOSPEL IN MUSIC — WHY YOU GOTTA BE SO MEAN?

Yes I do. I like a lot of music by Taylor Swift, at least the older stuff. And it started with “Mean.”

I did not come to this song as a fan. I came to it sideways—through my daughter, through a car ride, through a melody I thought I already understood without ever really listening. That makes sense, doesn’t it? We are remarkably confident in our dislikes, especially when they cost us nothing. I had decided, long ago and with very little evidence, that Taylor Swift’s music was not for me. Then my daughter played “Mean” and asked me to really listen. So I listened. Truly listened. And something in me shifted.

I do not follow her personal life. I do not approve of everything she does. That is not an attack; it is simply a fact. But the song itself stood apart from all of that noise. It was honest without being bitter, wounded without being cruel. It named injustice without baptizing retaliation. And that—unexpectedly—felt Gospel-shaped.

The Gospel often comes to us that way. Not always through pulpits and proclamations, but through truth that refuses to harden. Jesus did not deny cruelty; He endured it. Yet He would not become what wounded Him. The Word says, “When He was reviled, He did not revile in return; when He suffered, He did not threaten, but committed Himself to Him who judges righteously” (1 Peter 2:23). That restraint—that holy refusal to mirror ugliness—is not weakness. It is the quiet strength of love that knows where history is going.

What struck me about “Mean” is that it refuses to let the mocker have the last word. The song does not pretend that cruelty is imaginary, nor does it pretend that words do not wound. Instead, it looks beyond the present moment and imagines a future where the voice of meanness has faded into irrelevance. That is not escapism; that is hope. And hope, biblically speaking, is never naive. “Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good” (Romans 12:21). Evil is real—but it is not final.

The Gospel teaches us that our struggle is not finally against people, but against the darker currents that move through fallen hearts. “For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers” (Ephesians 6:12). That distinction matters. When we forget it, we start fighting people instead of resisting sin. We return insult for insult, wound for wound, and convince ourselves that this is strength. It is not. It is surrender—just dressed up as courage.

Meekness, on the other hand, is one of the most misunderstood virtues in Scripture. “Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth” (Matthew 5:5). Meekness is not silence born of fear; it is restraint born of confidence. It is the settled assurance that you do not need to crush another soul to stand tall. The cross itself is the greatest refusal to be mean the world has ever seen. Humanity hurled its worst at Christ, and He answered with forgiveness, resurrection, and an open invitation back home.

That is why this song lingered with me. Not because it is perfect, but because it points in the right direction. It reminds me that grace sometimes slips into the world through unexpected doorways—through daughters and dashboards, through banjos and back seats, through songs we had already dismissed without listening. The Gospel has always had a habit of doing that.

We can stop being mean. Not because the world suddenly deserves it, but because Christ has already absorbed the world’s cruelty and answered it with life. The Gospel does not shout back—it sings a better song. And sometimes, on an ordinary drive, you hear a reminder of it where you least expected.

__________

Lord Jesus, soften our hearts where the world has hardened them. Teach us to answer cruelty with courage, and meanness with mercy. Tune our lives to the melody of Your grace, that we may sing hope into a weary world. Amen.

BDD

THE GOSPEL IN HISTORY — THE CONTENT OF THEIR CHARACTER

When Martin Luther King Jr. stood on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in August of 1963, he did not merely deliver a speech; he unveiled a moral vision that had been fermenting for centuries—drawn from Scripture, refined by suffering, and articulated with prophetic clarity. The nation heard soaring rhetoric, but beneath the cadence was a conviction older than America itself: that human worth is not measured by externals, but by the inward reality of character formed by truth and love.

When he declared that he dreamed of a day when his children would “not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character,” King was not offering a slogan; he was issuing a moral indictment. He was challenging a society addicted to surface judgments to repent and to learn again how God evaluates a human being. Skin is accidental; character is essential. One is inherited; the other is cultivated. One belongs to the dust; the other to the soul.

The significance of that moment cannot be overstated. King was not calling merely for legal reform—though laws mattered—but for moral transformation. He understood that unjust systems are downstream from unjust hearts. To change a nation, one must first reeducate its conscience. That is why his dream was not framed in policy but in personhood; not in legislation alone, but in love shaped by justice.

His greatness lay not only in his courage but in his restraint. He rejected violence not because he was naïve, but because he was convinced. He believed that hate corrodes the vessel that carries it, and that darkness cannot drive out darkness—only light can do that. This was not political calculation; it was theological certainty. King’s strength was cruciform—power expressed through sacrifice, victory through suffering, justice through mercy.

What did he mean by the content of their character? He meant the inner life—the moral fiber revealed when no applause is present. He meant integrity over image, virtue over visibility, righteousness over reputation. Character is what remains when titles are stripped away and crowds disperse. It is who a man is when no one is watching, and who he becomes when everyone is.

This vision is profoundly biblical. Scripture has always insisted that God looks past appearances and weighs the heart. “For the Lord does not see as man sees; for man looks at the outward appearance, but the Lord looks at the heart” (1 Samuel 16:7). The prophets thundered against hollow religiosity, and Jesus Himself exposed a world obsessed with externals while neglecting inward holiness. He rebuked those who cleaned the outside of the cup while the inside remained corrupt, reminding them that true righteousness begins within (Matthew 23:25-26).

King’s dream echoes the ethic of Christ, who dismantled hierarchies of race, status, and power by redefining greatness as servanthood and worth as God-given. The apostle Paul declared that in Christ there is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female—not because distinctions vanish, but because none of them determine value (Galatians 3:28). Character, formed by love, becomes the true measure.

Martin Luther King Jr. called America back to its conscience, but more deeply, he called it back to its Bible. His words endure because they are tethered to eternal truth. Empires rise and fall, laws change, movements fade—but righteousness rooted in the image of God endures forever. To judge by character is not merely enlightened; it is obedient. It is to agree with heaven about what truly matters.

BDD

CONSIDER THE LILIES

Jesus does not say, dissect the lilies, nor does He invite us to audit them with a clipboard and a balance sheet; He says, consider. Slow the mind. Steady the heart. Look long enough for the soul to catch up.

The lilies are not object lessons in effort but revelations of grace—quiet sermons rooted in ordinary soil, proclaiming the generosity of God without a single syllable spoken.

Jesus presses the question deeper when He says, “So why do you worry about clothing? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow: they neither toil nor spin; and yet I say to you that even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. Now if God so clothes the grass of the field, which today is, and tomorrow is thrown into the oven, will He not much more clothe you, O you of little faith?” (Matthew 6:28–30).

The force of His teaching lies as much in what the lilies do not do as in what they are. They do not strive for legitimacy; they do not hustle for beauty; they do not anxiously justify their place in the field. They grow—because they were planted. They are clothed—because God clothes them. Their entire existence is a settled trust in the hand that placed them where they stand.

Here our worry is gently uncovered. Anxiety is rarely about fabric or food; it is about control. It assumes that provision must be earned, that covering depends on spinning, that worth is measured by output. Jesus overturns this assumption with a flower. Solomon’s splendor was accumulated; the lily’s beauty was bestowed. One was achieved; the other was given—and Christ declares the given to be greater.

The lilies expose legalism without raising their voice. They possess no résumé, keep no spiritual accounts, and yet they are arrayed in a glory that outshines kings. This is the grammar of the Kingdom: not wages but gift, not anxious compliance but confident trust. The lilies do not earn their covering; they receive it daily and effortlessly and faithfully.

Then comes the tender correction—O you of little faith. Not faithless, but faith still learning to rest. Faith that believes it must assist God with its own spinning; faith that fears tomorrow will expose today’s insufficiency. Jesus answers that fear by reminding us who God is. If the Father lavishes care on grass destined for the oven, how much more on children destined for glory.

The lilies are not reckless; they are secure. They grow toward the sun because life draws them there, not because fear drives them. So it is with us when grace finally persuades us that we are already clothed—in Christ, in righteousness not our own, in a care that does not fluctuate with our performance.

To consider the lilies is to unlearn the habit of self-provision and to remember our place as sons and daughters. It is to see that the Kingdom is not sustained by our spinning but by our trusting. The field still blooms—and so does the soul that rests in the Father’s care.

____________

Father, still my anxious striving; teach me to trust Your provision. Clothe me in Christ, root me in grace, and let my life grow in peace. Amen.

BDD

LEARNING TO EXTEND GRACE

Grace is not learned in the abstract; it is learned in contact—where expectations collide with weakness, where disappointment meets humanity. To extend grace is to move through the world aware that we ourselves are upheld at every moment by a mercy we did not earn. Christianity does not begin with our performance; it begins with God’s disposition toward us. Grace is not His occasional mood—it is His settled posture.

The Bible states it plainly and without embarrassment: “For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast.” (Ephesians 2:8-9)

Grace is gift before it is duty. And until that order is settled in the soul, extending grace to others will always feel like loss instead of overflow.

The pattern is set by God Himself. We are not asked to invent grace; we are invited to mirror it. “But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.” (Romans 5:8).

Grace does not wait for improvement. It moves first, speaks first, gives first. Christ did not die for us once we were reasonable, cooperative, or grateful—but while we were still sinners. That is the logic of heaven, and it dismantles the ledger books we so carefully keep.

Jesus teaches this same unsettling arithmetic when Peter asks about limits—about how long grace should be extended before it expires. “Then Peter came to Him and said, ‘Lord, how often shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? Up to seven times?’ Jesus said to him, ‘I do not say to you, up to seven times, but up to seventy times seven.’” (Matthew 18:21-22).

Grace is not measured by frequency; it is governed by resemblance. We forgive not because the other deserves it, but because we have been forgiven beyond calculation.

Paul presses the truth deeper, grounding grace not in emotion but in identity. “Be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God in Christ forgave you.” (Ephesians 4:32).

Notice the direction of the sentence. We forgive because we have been forgiven. Grace extended horizontally is always supplied vertically. When forgiveness dries up, it is not because the offense was too great—it is because the fountain has been forgotten.

Grace does not deny truth; it delivers it safely. “Brethren, if a man is overtaken in any trespass, you who are spiritual restore such a one in a spirit of gentleness, considering yourself lest you also be tempted.” (Galatians 6:1).

Gentleness is not weakness; it is strength that remembers its own vulnerability. Grace never looks down from a height—it kneels beside and lifts.

James reminds us that the way we measure others will one day be reflected back to us.“For judgment is without mercy to the one who has shown no mercy. Mercy triumphs over judgment.” (James 2:13).

Grace triumphs—not by excusing sin, but by outlasting it. Judgment ends conversations; grace redeems them. Judgment isolates; grace restores. Judgment hardens the heart; grace keeps it human.

And when we fear that extending grace will cost us too much, the Gospel answers with quiet certainty: “And God is able to make all grace abound toward you, that you, always having all sufficiency in all things, may have an abundance for every good work.” (2 Corinthians 9:8)

Grace given does not diminish the giver. There is always more at the source.

To learn to extend grace is to agree with reality: that we are not self-made, not self-sustained, not self-righteous. We live by mercy. We breathe grace. And when we extend it—freely, patiently, repeatedly—we are not being naïve. We are being accurate about the God who has dealt so gently with us.

____________

Lord Jesus, remind us daily how patiently You have dealt with us. Loosen our grip on judgment and teach our hands the language of mercy. Let the grace we have received become the grace we freely give, until our lives reflect Your heart. Amen.

BDD

LEARNING TO WALK IN LOVE

There is a way of moving through the world that is neither hurried nor harsh; it has motion, intention, and a quiet strength. Scripture calls it walking in love. Not speaking about love merely, nor defending it in theory, but placing one foot before the other in the steady practice of it—thought after thought, word after word, action after action. Love is not an ornament added to the Christian life; it is the road itself. “Walk in love,” we are told, “as Christ also has loved us and given Himself for us” (Ephesians 5:2). The command is simple; the depth is immeasurable.

Love begins not with our resolve, but with God’s initiative. “We love Him because He first loved us” (1 John 4:19). That order is everything. Christianity does not ask us to manufacture affection out of moral grit; it announces that divine love has already been poured out, flooding the heart before the feet ever move. “The love of God has been poured out in our hearts by the Holy Spirit who was given to us” (Romans 5:5). We do not walk toward love; we walk from it—saturated, supplied, and sustained.

Jesus does not leave love undefined. He gives it edges and weight. “A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another; as I have loved you” (John 13:34). The measure is not our sincerity but His sacrifice. And then He presses the point further: “By this all will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another” (John 13:35). Love is the Church’s accent; without it, we speak Christianity with a foreign tongue.

Paul, with the precision of a master craftsman, shows us what love looks like when it puts on flesh. Love suffers long and is kind; it does not envy; it does not parade itself; it is not puffed up (1 Corinthians 13:4). Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things (1 Corinthians 13:7). This is not sentimental softness—it is moral strength under control, grace refusing to quit. And then comes the staggering conclusion: “Now abide faith, hope, love, these three; but the greatest of these is love” (1 Corinthians 13:13). Love outlasts the world itself.

To walk in love is to let love rule the inner life. “Above all these things put on love, which is the bond of perfection” (Colossians 3:14). Love is not one virtue among many; it is the belt that holds them together. Without it, patience frays, kindness thins, truth hardens. With it, even correction becomes gentle and truth becomes livable.

This love is not opposed to holiness; it is holiness expressed. “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind…and you shall love your neighbor as yourself” (Matthew 22:37–39). Upon these two, Jesus says, hang all the Law and the Prophets (Matthew 22:40). Love is not the abandonment of obedience; it is obedience distilled to its purest form.

And this love grows as fruit, not strain. “The fruit of the Spirit is love” (Galatians 5:22). Not the fruit of willpower, not the fruit of religious anxiety, but the natural outcome of a life rooted in the Spirit. Walking in love, then, is learning to keep step with what God is already producing within us.

In the end, love is the most convincing apologetic and the clearest confession. “Beloved, let us love one another, for love is of God; and everyone who loves is born of God and knows God” (1 John 4:7). To walk in love is to make God visible in ordinary steps—at tables, in traffic, in disagreement, in forgiveness quietly chosen again.

Love is the “law” of God.

__________

Lord Jesus, teach us to walk as You walked—rooted in the Father’s love, steady in grace, unafraid to give ourselves away. Let Your love govern our steps, soften our words, and shape our lives, until others glimpse You in the way we love. Amen.

THE GOSPEL IN MUSIC — MOZART AND THE DIVINE SYMPHONY

There is a moral motion in music—a rightness that does not argue, yet convinces. It moves forward with inevitability, never frantic, never lost. Enter Mozart, and one senses that the universe itself has remembered how to breathe. Every phrase knows where it is going; every resolution arrives not by force, but by faithfulness. Logic is satisfied, yes—but joy is awakened. And somewhere within that ordered beauty, the Gospel is not shouted; it is heard.

Consider harmony. Not the flattening of voices into sameness, but the bringing together of differences into meaning. Mozart never allows one line to bully the others; each voice has dignity, each part has purpose. The Gospel works the same miracle. We are not saved by becoming identical, but by being gathered into Christ. “For as the body is one, and has many members, but all the members of that one body, being many, are one body—so also is Christ” (1 Corinthians 12:12). Law can demand alignment, but only grace can create harmony. The law can command the notes; Christ writes the music.

And then there is the honest beauty of tension. Mozart does not fear the minor key. He knows that joy which has never wept is thin, and laughter untouched by sorrow is brittle. His music carries both sunlight and shadow—often in the same phrase. So does the Gospel. It does not deny suffering; it redeems it. The cross stands as the darkest chord ever struck in human history, yet it resolves—not into despair, but into resurrection. The sorrow is real; the joy is deeper. Death is not ignored; it is defeated. What looks like dissonance is, in truth, preparation for glory.

Notice also the page itself. Ink and paper hold the notes, but they do not make the music. Until breath enters—until fingers move and bows draw—the score is only potential. So it is with Scripture. Words alone, untreated by the Spirit, can sit unopened, unmoving. But when God breathes upon His Word, it lives. “For the word of God is living and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword” (Hebrews 4:12). The Spirit does not add to the Word; He animates it. And we, like instruments in the hand of a Master, must yield if the music is to be heard.

And finally, consider time. Mozart has been silent for centuries, yet his music refuses to grow old. It speaks now as clearly as ever—because truth does not expire. The same is true of Christ. His incarnation did not fade into history; it entered eternity. His Gospel still sounds, still calls, still gathers wandering hearts into order and beauty and rest. What was written long ago continues to play—because it was composed in heaven.

So let us hear the Gospel in music. Not as noise, but as meaning; not as chaos, but as coherence. The law becomes melody in Christ. The cross becomes harmony. Grace carries us, measure by measure, into the joy of God. This is not improvisation. It is a finished work—perfectly composed, faithfully performed, and forever true.

__________

Lord Jesus, tune our hearts to Your grace; quiet our striving, order our loves, and let our lives sound forth the music of the Gospel—until heaven and earth join in perfect harmony. Amen.

BDD

THE GOSPEL IN BOTANY — LIGHT, LIFE, AND GROWTH

Walk through a forest, a garden, or even a small patch of wildflowers, and you encounter more than leaves and stems. You encounter a testimony. Every green shoot, every unfolding bud, every leaf turning toward the sun is a living sermon, a silent parable of God’s grace. Even the simplest blade of grass embodies principles that whisper of Christ.

Consider photosynthesis—the quiet process by which plants take in light, water, and carbon dioxide, and transform them into life-giving energy. There is no force, no striving beyond the plant’s design; the process is built into its very nature.

Yet without sunlight, the plant withers; without the exchange of elements, life slows and fades. It is a natural law, orderly and precise, yet it points to a spiritual truth: Christ is the Sun of our souls. Just as plants must turn toward the light to live, we must turn toward Jesus to thrive. “I am the light of the world; he who follows Me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life” (John 8:12).

Even more, photosynthesis demonstrates transformation. Carbon dioxide and water, humble and ordinary, are remade into something vibrant, sustaining, and beautiful. Sin-stained hearts, spiritually lifeless and unable to sustain themselves, are likewise transformed in Christ. He absorbs the weight of our failures and pours out life in exchange—resurrection energy that grows quietly, patiently, in hidden places, until it bears fruit in love, joy, peace, and hope.

And notice the generosity of the process: oxygen, a byproduct of the plant’s transformation, flows freely into the world. Life given is life shared. In Christ, we are not merely saved; we are made conduits of blessing, carrying light and sustenance into the world around us. Grace is not hoarded; it flows outward, sustaining the thirsty, feeding the weak, giving breath to the forgotten.

So let the Gospel in botany speak to you. Turn your heart toward the light. Let Christ transform the ordinary into the extraordinary. Bear fruit quietly, steadily, and in all seasons. And remember: even the smallest leaf, obedient to the sun, testifies to the wonder of a Creator whose power turns darkness into light.

__________

Lord Jesus, may our hearts be like the green leaves of Your creation—open, receiving, alive. Transform our ordinary days with Your extraordinary grace, and let our lives reflect the light and life that only You can give. Amen.

BDD

JESUS IN ISAIAH: THE PROMISE THAT WOULD NOT LET HISTORY GO

Isaiah does not argue; he announces. He does not speculate; he declares. He stands in a collapsing nation, watching kings rise and fall like sandcastles before the tide, and he does something profoundly unreasonable—he speaks with certainty about a Man who has not yet arrived. This is not poetry born of wishful thinking; it is prophecy forged by necessity. If God is faithful, Isaiah reasons, then God must act. And if God acts, He must act decisively, personally, finally.

So Isaiah begins where logic demands he begin—with the problem. Humanity walks in darkness, not because it lacks intelligence, but because it lacks light. Instruction alone will not cure blindness. Law alone will not warm a frozen heart. Therefore, light must come to us. “The people who walked in darkness have seen a great light” (Isaiah 9:2). Notice the certainty—have seen. Not might see. Not could see. History, Isaiah insists, is already leaning toward fulfillment.

Then comes the unavoidable conclusion. If the light truly comes, it cannot merely be an idea. Ideas do not rule. Ideas do not carry peace on their shoulders. A Person must arrive—one capable of bearing authority without corruption.

“For unto us a Child is born, unto us a Son is given; and the government will be upon His shoulder” (Isaiah 9:6). The shoulder is a place for burdens, and Isaiah reasons rightly: if the government rests there, then this Child must be strong enough to carry the weight of the world without buckling. Thus the names follow, not as ornament but as evidence—Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace (Isaiah 9:6). Titles are conclusions drawn from character.

Yet Isaiah will not allow us to mistake power for triumphalism. He moves, with deliberate restraint, from the throne room to the dust. If this Deliverer truly saves, He must confront the root problem—sin—and sin always demands payment.

Therefore, the Messiah must suffer. Not accidentally. Not symbolically. Purposefully. “He is despised and rejected by men, a Man of sorrows and acquainted with grief” (Isaiah 53:3). The logic is relentless: guilt must be borne, wounds must be taken, peace must be purchased. “He was wounded for our transgressions, He was bruised for our iniquities; the chastisement for our peace was upon Him” (Isaiah 53:5).

Isaiah presses the point further, as though anticipating our objections. This suffering Servant is not a victim of circumstance. “The Lord has laid on Him the iniquity of us all” (Isaiah 53:6). Substitution is not a metaphor here; it is the mechanism of redemption. Justice is not ignored—it is satisfied. Mercy is not sentimental—it is costly. The cross, though unnamed, is already standing in Isaiah’s mind, casting its shadow backward through the centuries.

And then, without fanfare, Isaiah introduces the final necessity. Death cannot have the last word if God’s purposes are coherent. A dead Savior saves no one. Therefore, satisfaction must follow sacrifice. “He shall see the labor of His soul, and be satisfied” (Isaiah 53:11). Resurrection is not announced with trumpets here; it is assumed as the only reasonable outcome of a faithful God keeping His promises.

Isaiah’s Jesus is not God reacting; He is God revealing. Not a contingency plan, but the central design. From light to government, from suffering to glory, the argument holds. Remove Jesus, and Isaiah collapses into contradiction. Leave Him in, and history makes sense.

The prophet saw it clearly: the world would not be healed by force, nor corrected by law, but rescued by a Servant-King whose strength was proved by His wounds.

BDD

A NATION OUT OF BALANCE—WHEN PRAISE AND CRITICISM LOSE THEIR WAY

There is something wrong with us—not politically first, but spiritually. We have lost the ability to evaluate actions once a name is attached to them. Mention Donald Trump, and for some, every sentence must end in condemnation; no good may be named without suspicion. Mention Barack Obama, and for others, criticism becomes taboo while praise flows freely. We no longer weigh deeds; we weigh allegiances.

This is not moral seriousness. It is imbalance.

Those who speak passionately about injustice should—by the very logic of their convictions—be able to acknowledge genuine movements toward peace wherever they occur. If violence is reduced, lives are spared; if war is halted, mothers keep their sons. Scripture does not ask first, Who did this? but What fruit did it bear? “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God” (Matthew 5:9). The verse carries no party affiliation.

This does not require naïveté. Acknowledging a good outcome is not the same as endorsing every motive, policy, or pattern that surrounds it. Moral clarity does not demand blindness; it demands precision. The Christian conscience must be capable of saying, This was wrong—and, in the same breath, this was good—even when both belong to the same person.

We have seen this failure before. A decade ago, many who now condemn everything associated with Trump once found nothing to criticize in Obama; others now praise Trump with an enthusiasm that once could see nothing but failure in Obama. The pattern did not change—only the names did. What shifted was not conviction, but loyalty.

Scripture warns us against this kind of distortion: “Do not judge according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgment” (John 7:24). Righteous judgment requires balance—neither reflexive outrage nor reflexive defense. Anything less is not discernment; it is captivity.

This is not a call to moral equivalence, nor a plea to mute prophetic critique. Power should be scrutinized; injustice should be named plainly; harm should never be excused.

But scrutiny is not the same as totalization.

When criticism becomes absolute—when no good may be acknowledged under any circumstances—it ceases to be prophetic and becomes performative. Likewise, when praise becomes absolute, it collapses into idolatry. God condemns both.

Jesus Himself modeled this balance. He rebuked rulers without flattening reality. He exposed corruption without denying truth when it appeared, even on the lips of opponents (Luke 20:39-40). He neither flattered nor caricatured. He spoke truth whole.

The deeper tragedy is not disagreement; it is absolutism. We have trained ourselves to speak in slogans rather than judgments, to react rather than reason. James warned us long ago: “The wrath of man does not produce the righteousness of God” (James 1:20). Outrage has never healed a nation. Selective blindness has never produced justice.

If Christians cannot model clear-eyed fairness—truthful enough to condemn evil wherever it appears, honest enough to acknowledge good wherever it emerges—then we have surrendered our witness. We are not called to be cheerleaders or executioners; we are called to be salt and light. Salt preserves. Light reveals. Neither distorts.

A nation does not heal by winning arguments. It heals when truth is loved more than tribes, justice more than outrage, and peace more than pride. “Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty” (2 Corinthians 3:17). That liberty includes freedom from blind hatred and blind loyalty alike.

This is not political moderation.

It is moral maturity.

And I want to be clear about where I stand—because clarity disarms suspicion, and honesty earns a hearing. I humanize this so that critics have to deal with my argument rather than caricature my motives.

I like Barack Obama. He is my favorite president. I admired his intellect, his composure, and his ability to speak in a way that reminded the country of its better angels. And I can still acknowledge places where I believe he fell short. Appreciation has never required blindness.

I did not vote for Donald Trump. I do not share his temperament, his tone, or much of his approach. And yet—I pray for him every day. Not selectively. Not sarcastically. Because the Lord commands prayer for those in authority, not only the ones we prefer (1 Timothy 2:1-2). Prayer is not endorsement; it is obedience. It is also an act of hope—that God can restrain evil, encourage good, and bring peace even through flawed instruments.

I say this because my concern is not defending politicians. It is defending moral credibility. When we are incapable of acknowledging good in someone we dislike—or wrong in someone we admire—we lose the right to be taken seriously. Our criticism stops sounding principled and starts sounding personal. And once that happens, no amount of volume will restore trust.

This article is not about changing party allegiance. It is about recovering balance—so that our words carry weight again.

Constant negativity does not make us prophetic; it makes us predictable. If every sentence about a person is critical, people stop listening—not because they disagree, but because they already know what you are going to say. Criticism that never pauses to acknowledge truth, progress, or restraint eventually collapses under its own excess.

The Gospel calls us to something better than reflexive outrage. It calls us to truth spoken whole. Jesus was never impressed by power, but He was never dishonest either. He could condemn injustice without denying reality. He could speak hard words without surrendering to contempt.

That is the posture I am pleading for—not political compromise, but moral seriousness.

If we want to be heard when it matters most, we must prove that our judgments are not driven by anger or allegiance, but by truth. That means learning to say, This was wrong—and also, when it is true, this was good. Anything less is not conviction; it is noise.

I am not asking anyone to change who they support. I am asking us to change how we speak, so that when we do speak, it still sounds like wisdom—and still resembles Christ.

BDD

PEACE ON EARTH—AND THE ONE WHO GOES DEEPER STILL

“Peace on earth” is a phrase large enough to hold many lives. Martin Luther King Jr. bore it in marches and sermons; Nelson Mandela carried it through long years of iron bars and patient reconciliation; Gandhi embodied it in disciplined nonviolence and moral courage. In real and luminous ways, they reflect Jesus—turning the other cheek, refusing the sword, insisting that hatred cannot heal hatred. They remind us that peacemaking is not passive; it is costly, public, and brave.

And yet—here is the necessary distinction—they are like Jesus in their pursuit of peace, but they are not the same as Jesus in the way peace is finally made. They sought reconciliation between people; Jesus makes reconciliation within people. They confronted injustice with moral force; Jesus confronts sin with redeeming love. They appealed to conscience; Jesus remakes the conscience. Their work presses history toward justice; His work penetrates the heart and reconciles it to God (2 Corinthians 5:18-19).

Jesus does not merely teach peace—He is our peace (Ephesians 2:14). He does not only model forgiveness—He accomplishes it, absorbing violence rather than mirroring it, canceling the debt by the cross rather than managing it by restraint (Colossians 2:14). Where human peacemakers must persuade, Jesus regenerates. Where they must wait for agreement, Jesus grants new birth. Where they labor outwardly, He works inwardly—writing His will on the heart (Jeremiah 31:33).

This is not to diminish the giants of peace; it is to locate them properly. They are signposts. Christ is the destination. They show us what love can do among nations; He shows us what grace does to the soul. Their peace can be fragile and hard-won; His peace passes understanding and guards the heart and mind (Philippians 4:7).

So we honor the peacemakers—and we worship the Prince of Peace. We learn from the former—and we live by the latter. Because peace on earth, if it is to last, must be born from peace with God; and that peace does not arrive by method or movement, but by a Person (Romans 5:1).

___________

Lord Jesus, teach us to love peace and to trust You for it; to honor those who labor for reconciliation, and to rest our hope in You alone—the One who makes us whole. Amen.

BDD

THE BLANK CHECK OF GRACE—PROVEN BEYOND DISPUTE

Let us prove it—cleanly, relentlessly, and without escape. Not with slogans, not with sentimentality, not with rebellion disguised as freedom—but with logic, Scripture, and the plain force of the Gospel itself. If Christianity does not give you a blank check of love-driven obedience, then it gives you nothing at all.

• Claim: You are free to serve Christ—not by rules and regulations, but by guiding principles; not by an external law code, but by an inward principle of grace.

We will prove this in five movements. Each one locks into the next. Remove one, and the Gospel collapses. Leave them standing, and the case is closed.

I. THE NATURE OF LAW—WHAT IT CAN AND CANNOT DO

• Law can command; it cannot create.

• Law can diagnose; it cannot heal.

• Law can restrain behavior; it cannot generate love.

Scripture does not whisper this—it declares it.

• “For what the law could not do in that it was weak through the flesh, God did by sending His own Son” (Romans 8:3).

If law were sufficient, Christ was unnecessary. If rules could produce righteousness, the Incarnation was a grotesque overreaction. The law speaks to the flesh; grace works within the heart.

Paul is mercilessly logical:

• “By the works of the law no flesh shall be justified” (Galatians 2:16).

If justification does not come by law, sanctification cannot come by law either. A system that cannot start the Christian life cannot sustain it. To argue otherwise is to insist that what failed at the foundation will succeed in the structure.

That is not theology; it is incoherence.

II. THE CROSS ENDS EXTERNAL RELIGION—FULL STOP

The cross does not assist law; it replaces it.

“Having wiped out the handwriting of requirements that was against us, which was contrary to us. And He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross.” (Colossians 2:14).

Notice what is not said.

• Law is not revised.

• It is not softened.

• It is not spiritualized.

• It is nailed.

You cannot resurrect what God has executed without calling the cross insufficient. To rebuild an external code as the governing principle of Christian living is to deny the finality of Calvary.

Paul anticipates the objection and crushes it:

“If righteousness comes through law, then Christ died in vain” (Galatians 2:21).

There is no middle ground here. Either Christ is enough, or He is not.

III. THE NEW COVENANT IS INTERNAL BY DESIGN

The old covenant said, Do this and live.

The new covenant says, Live—and therefore do.

God promised this long before Bethlehem:

“I will put My law in their minds, and write it on their hearts” (Jeremiah 31:33).

The writer of Hebrews confirms it with surgical clarity:

“He has made the first obsolete” (Hebrews 8:13).

Obsolete does not mean “still useful if handled carefully.”

Obsolete means replaced by something superior.

What replaces it?

“The law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has made me free from the law of sin and death” (Romans 8:2).

Not lawlessness—but a different operating system. External compulsion is replaced by internal transformation. The believer does not obey to become alive; he obeys because he is alive.

IV. LOVE, NOT LAW, IS THE GOVERNING POWER

Law restrains from the outside. Love compels from the inside.

Paul does not say, The fear of punishment controls us.

He says:

“The love of Christ compels us” (2 Corinthians 5:14).

Love is not vague. Love is precise. Love fulfills what law could only point toward:

“Love does no harm to a neighbor; therefore love is the fulfillment of the law” (Romans 13:10).

Notice—fulfillment, not abolition by chaos. Love reaches the destination the law could only post signposts toward. When love reigns, the law has nothing left to say.

That is why Paul dares to say the unthinkable:

“All things are lawful for me, but not all things are helpful” (1 Corinthians 6:12).

That is not moral anarchy; that is moral maturity. Only a free person can speak that way. Only someone governed by inward grace—not outward threat—can reason like this.

V. THE FINAL PROOF—SONS, NOT SERVANTS

• Rules produce servants.

• Grace produces sons.

• And sons do not live by rulebooks; they live by relationship.

“You did not receive the spirit of bondage again to fear, but you received the Spirit of adoption by whom we cry out, ‘Abba, Father’” (Romans 8:15).

Bondage and sonship cannot coexist. Fear and love cannot share the throne.

John makes it airtight:

• “There is no fear in love; but perfect love casts out fear” (1 John 4:18).

If your obedience is driven by fear of disqualification, you are living beneath your inheritance. If your Christian life is governed by external regulation, you are functioning as a servant when God has declared you a son.

CONCLUSION: THE BLANK CHECK—RIGHTLY UNDERSTOOD

Yes—you have a blank check.

• Not to sin, but to love.

• Not to indulge the flesh, but to serve freely.

• Not to ignore holiness, but to pursue it without coercion.

You are not micromanaged by heaven.

• You are trusted.

• You are indwelt.

• You are guided from within.

“Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty” (2 Corinthians 3:17).

This is not rebellion.

This is not antinomianism.

This is Christianity—undiluted, unafraid, and finally honest.

Rules never produced saints.

Grace always has.

___________

Lord Jesus, Teach us to trust the freedom You purchased; to walk not by fear, but by love; to obey not because we must, but because we want to. Write Your will deeper into our hearts, until our lives answer You naturally—as sons, not slaves. Amen.

BDD

DON’T LISTEN TO THEM — YOU HAVE A BLANK CHECK

There will always be voices—earnest, confident, well-meaning—who insist that the life of faith must fit inside carefully labeled boxes. They will offer you systems instead of a Savior; slogans instead of a Shepherd. They will warn you not to stray beyond their borders, as though grace itself were fenced land.

But the Gospel does not come to us with a clipboard or a flowchart; it comes with a cross. And at that cross, Christ does not hand you a contract with fine print—He hands you a blank check written in His own blood.

The apostle Paul declared, “Stand fast therefore in the liberty by which Christ has made us free, and do not be entangled again with a yoke of bondage” (Galatians 5:1). Liberty is not lawlessness; it is love unshackled. When Jesus calls you, He does not first ask which camp you belong to—He asks if you will follow.

The early disciples had little theology by way of labels, but they had Christ before their eyes, and that was enough to turn the world upside down (Acts 17:6). Truth walked among them, not as an abstraction, but as a Person—“full of grace and truth” (John 1:14).

“I am of this,” says one. “I am of that,” says another. Paul heard the same cries in Corinth and answered them with holy impatience: “Is Christ divided?” (1 Corinthians 1:13). The moment an “ism” becomes your refuge, Christ is quietly displaced. Systems may explain, but only Jesus saves. Doctrines may guide, but only love fulfills the law (Romans 13:10). You were not redeemed to become a defender of a tribe; you were redeemed to become a servant of the King—free, fearless, and faithful.

So do not listen to them when they tell you that grace must be rationed, or love measured, or mercy earned. You have a blank check because Christ paid the full price. “Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty” (2 Corinthians 3:17). Serve Him boldly. Love Him simply. Walk humbly. Let others keep their labels if they must—but you, keep your eyes on Jesus, “the author and finisher of our faith” (Hebrews 12:2).

____________

Lord Jesus, free my heart from every voice that competes with Yours. Teach me to serve You in liberty, to love without fear, and to follow without reservation. I place my trust not in systems, but in You alone. Amen.

BDD

CHRISTMAS — THE LAMP LIT BY HEAVEN

There are some who would have Christ stand forever in the manger—safe, silent, harmless; wrapped in straw and sentiment, admired but not obeyed. Yet the same Christ who lay beneath the low roof of Bethlehem now walks among the lampstands, His eyes as a flame of fire, His voice like many waters (Revelation 1:14-15).

We do Him no honor by keeping Him small. Love that never wounds our pride, mercy that never rebukes our sin, grace that never commands our allegiance—these are shadows of the true Christ, not the living Lord Himself.

Grace does not arrive with a ledger; it comes with a cross. The Gospel does not whisper permission to remain as we are; it proclaims power to become what we could never be. When heaven bent low and God took on flesh, it was not to admire our world but to redeem it. “You shall call His name Jesus, for He will save His people from their sins” (Matthew 1:21). Not soothe them in their sins—save them from them. Salvation is not a warm feeling by the fire; it is a resurrection from the dead.

Yet how gentle is this mighty Savior. He does not break the bruised reed nor quench the smoking flax (Isaiah 42:3). He comes not with a whip for the weary, but with rest for their souls (Matthew 11:28-29). His holiness does not repel the penitent; it heals them. His truth does not crush the contrite; it frees them. The same hand that overturns tables wipes tears; the same voice that commands the storm calls children by name. Here is majesty clothed in mercy—strength robed in love.

Let us then receive Him as He truly is—King and Comforter, Redeemer and Lord. Not merely as a symbol of peace, but as peace Himself; not merely as a teacher of virtue, but as the Life that raises the dead (John 14:6).

If Christ is born only in history and not in the heart, Christmas has passed us by. But if He reigns within—if faith bows and love obeys—then Bethlehem has come home, and heaven has touched the earth again.

____________

Lord Jesus, reign where I have only admired; rule where I have only remembered. Be born anew in my heart—King, Savior, and Friend. Amen.

BDD

WHEN LAW BECOMES LOUDER THAN INCARNATION

There are those who look upon Christmas with suspicion—not because they doubt Christ, but because they trust rules more than mystery. Their faith is carefully fenced; their theology measured with a ruler.

Salvation, to them, is clean, transactional, and efficiently explained. God saves by decree; man responds by compliance. Anything not explicitly commanded feels dangerous. Celebration itself becomes suspect.

And so Christmas, with its candles and carols, its joy and holy excess, is quietly escorted out of the sanctuary as though it were an undisciplined child.

They mean well. Legalism nearly always does. It wants to protect God from being mishandled and doctrine from being diluted. But in guarding the edges, it often loses the center.

Such aouls fear emotion as though joy were a heresy, forgetting that truth does not become false when it makes the heart burn. A faith which cannot tolerate wonder has mistaken precision for completeness. For when God entered time, He did not issue a regulation; He arrived as a baby.

The legalistic mind asks, Where is the command? Scripture answers with an event. “And the angel said unto them, ‘Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people’” (Luke 2:10). Joy is announced, not regulated. Celebration erupts before any theology is fully formed. Shepherds do not consult a creed; they run. Wise men do not parse a calendar; they travel. Mary does not outline a doctrine of the Incarnation; she treasures and ponders (Luke 2:19). Heaven itself seems unconcerned with whether this moment fits neatly into a rulebook.

Legalism insists that anything not commanded must be forbidden. The Gospel replies that grace always outruns our categories. “When the fullness of the time had come, God sent forth His Son” (Galatians 4:4). Not when humanity had perfected its obedience—but when it had exhausted itself trying.

Christmas declares that salvation is not God waiting for us to get it right, but God coming because we never could. To refuse celebration on the grounds of purity is to misunderstand holiness itself. Holiness, in Christ, moves toward sinners; it does not recoil from joy.

The same spirit which rejects Christmas will eventually struggle with grace. For if God may not be celebrated unless He is commanded, then love itself becomes suspect. And we should note the tragic irony: a system so focused on avoiding error that it misses the miracle standing in front of it. “The Word became flesh and dwelt among us” (John 1:14). God did not merely authorize salvation; He embodied it. The Incarnation is not an optional embellishment—it is the method.

So what is wrong with celebrating Christmas? Nothing—unless law has replaced love, unless fear has crowded out awe, unless salvation has been reduced to a checklist rather than a Child laid in a manger.

Christmas offends legalism because it insists that God saves not by tightening the rules, but by breaking into the world Himself—unexpected, unearned, and unimaginably near. “For by grace you have been saved through faith…it is the gift of God” (Ephesians 2:8).

____________

Lord Jesus, free us from cold obedience that forgets to adore. Rescue us from a faith that fears joy more than sin. Teach us to rejoice in Your coming—not as a rule to follow, but as a grace to receive. Amen.

BDD